Literature DB >> 12364491

Concordant and discordant coding of spatial location in populations of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells.

Joel E Brown1, William E Skaggs.   

Abstract

Pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus commonly show place-related activity, but it has been difficult to understand the factors that govern them. A particularly important question is whether individual cells have identifiable correlates that can be manipulated independently of the correlates of other cells. Recently Tanila et al. examined the activity of small ensembles of hippocampal cells in rats running on a plus-maze with distinct intra- and extramaze cues. When the two sets of cues were rotated 90 degrees in opposite directions, some cells followed the intramaze cues, others followed the extramaze cues, and others "remapped" unpredictably; moreover, all possible combinations were seen within simultaneously recorded ensembles. In the current study, CA1 pyramidal cell population activity was recorded from four rats in a similar paradigm, using a recording system that permitted the analysis of ensembles of 4-70 simultaneously recorded units. The results were consistent with the data from the earlier study in showing an increase in remapping over time and in showing some place fields following one of the defined sets of cues while others remapped. When the possibility of random remapping was controlled for, however, the analysis did not show significant numbers of place fields following both sets of cues simultaneously. Furthermore, all rats initially showed fully concordant responses with all place fields following the local cues. For two rats, this pattern continued until a new configuration was introduced at which time all fields switched to follow the distal cues. Taken together, the results are difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that individual hippocampal cells encode information about different subsets of cues in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12364491     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.1605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; Xintian Yu; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Learning causes reorganization of neuronal firing patterns to represent related experiences within a hippocampal schema.

Authors:  Sam McKenzie; Nick T M Robinson; Lauren Herrera; Jordana C Churchill; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Medial entorhinal grid cells and head direction cells rotate with a T-maze more often during less recently experienced rotations.

Authors:  Kishan Gupta; Nathan J Beer; Lauren A Keller; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  A simple neural network model of the hippocampus suggesting its pathfinding role in episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Alexei V Samsonovich; Giorgio A Ascoli
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  The influence of objects on place field expression and size in distal hippocampal CA1.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Andrew P Maurer; Saman Nematollahi; Ajay R Uprety; Jenelle L Wallace; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Dynamic grouping of hippocampal neural activity during cognitive control of two spatial frames.

Authors:  Eduard Kelemen; André A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Conflicts between local and global spatial frameworks dissociate neural representations of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Joshua P Neunuebel; D Yoganarasimha; Geeta Rao; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensory feedback, error correction, and remapping in a multiple oscillator model of place-cell activity.

Authors:  Joseph D Monaco; James J Knierim; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.