BACKGROUND: Functional decline in physically frail, elderly persons is associated with substantial morbidity. It is uncertain whether such functional decline can be prevented. METHODS: We randomly assigned 188 persons 75 years of age or older who were physically frail and living at home to undergo a six-month, home-based intervention program that includedphysical therapy and that focused primarily on improving underlying impairments in physical abilities, including balance, muscle strength, ability to transfer from one position to another, and mobility, or to undergo an educational program (as a control). The primary outcome was the change between base line and 3, 7, and 12 months in the score on a disability scale based on eight activities of daily living: walking, bathing, upper- and lower-body dressing, transferring from a chair, using the toilet, eating, and grooming. Scores on the scale ranged from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating more severe disability. RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group had less functional decline over time, according to their disability scores, than participants in the control group. The disability scores in the intervention and control groups were 2.3 and 2.8, respectively, at base line; 2.0 and 3.6 at 7 months (P=0.008 for the comparison between the groups in the change from base line); and 2.7 and 4.2 at 12 months (P=0.02). The benefit of the intervention was observed among participants with moderate frailty but not those with severe frailty. The frequency of admission to a nursing home did not differ significantly between the intervention group and the control group (14 percent and 19 percent, respectively; P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: A home-based program targeting underlying impairments in physical abilities can reduce the progression of functional decline among physically frail, elderly persons who live at home. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Functional decline in physically frail, elderly persons is associated with substantial morbidity. It is uncertain whether such functional decline can be prevented. METHODS: We randomly assigned 188 persons 75 years of age or older who were physically frail and living at home to undergo a six-month, home-based intervention program that included physical therapy and that focused primarily on improving underlying impairments in physical abilities, including balance, muscle strength, ability to transfer from one position to another, and mobility, or to undergo an educational program (as a control). The primary outcome was the change between base line and 3, 7, and 12 months in the score on a disability scale based on eight activities of daily living: walking, bathing, upper- and lower-body dressing, transferring from a chair, using the toilet, eating, and grooming. Scores on the scale ranged from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating more severe disability. RESULTS:Participants in the intervention group had less functional decline over time, according to their disability scores, than participants in the control group. The disability scores in the intervention and control groups were 2.3 and 2.8, respectively, at base line; 2.0 and 3.6 at 7 months (P=0.008 for the comparison between the groups in the change from base line); and 2.7 and 4.2 at 12 months (P=0.02). The benefit of the intervention was observed among participants with moderate frailty but not those with severe frailty. The frequency of admission to a nursing home did not differ significantly between the intervention group and the control group (14 percent and 19 percent, respectively; P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: A home-based program targeting underlying impairments in physical abilities can reduce the progression of functional decline among physically frail, elderly persons who live at home. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Ngaire Kerse; Karen J Hayman; Simon A Moyes; Kathy Peri; Elizabeth Robinson; Anthony Dowell; Gregory S Kolt; C Raina Elley; Simon Hatcher; Liz Kiata; Janine Wiles; Sally Keeling; John Parsons; Bruce Arroll Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sally Sizer Fitts; Chang Won Won; Barbara Williams; Susan J Snyder; Michi Yukawa; Victor J Legner; James P Logerfo; Elizabeth A Phelan Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2008-01-01
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; J W Wolff; B Leff; R J Thorpe; E K Tanner; C Boyd; Q Xue; J Guralnik; D Bishai; L N Gitlin Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Nancy Hodgson; Joanne Lynn; Brenda C Spillman; Timothy Waidmann; Anne M Wilkinson; Douglas A Wolf Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: S Karinkanta; A Heinonen; H Sievänen; K Uusi-Rasi; M Pasanen; K Ojala; M Fogelholm; P Kannus Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Lies Lahousse; Bastiaan Maes; Gijsbertus Ziere; Daan W Loth; Vincentius J A Verlinden; M Carola Zillikens; André G Uitterlinden; Fernando Rivadeneira; Henning Tiemeier; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Albert Hofman; Guy G Brusselle; Bruno H Stricker Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 8.082