Literature DB >> 12360068

Bridging tendon defects using autologous tenocyte engineered tendon in a hen model.

Yilin Cao1, Yongtao Liu, Wei Liu, Qingxin Shan, Samuel D Buonocore, Lei Cui.   

Abstract

Tendon defects remain a major concern in plastic surgery because of the limited availability of tendon autografts. Whereas immune rejection prohibits the use of tendon allografts, most prosthetic replacements also fail to achieve a satisfactory long-term result of tendon repair. The tissue engineering technique, however, can generate different tissues using autologous cells and thus may provide an optimal approach to address this concern. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of engineering tendon tissues with autologous tenocytes to bridge a tendon defect in either a tendon sheath open model or a partial open model in the hen. In a total of 40 Leghorn hens, flexor tendons were harvested from the left feet and were digested with 0.25% type II collagenase. The isolated tenocytes were expanded in vitro and mixed with unwoven polyglycolic acid fibers to form a cell-scaffold construct in the shape of a tendon. The constructs were wrapped with intestinal submucosa and then cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum for 1 week before in vivo transplantation. On the feet, a defect of 3 to 4 cm was created at the second flexor digitorum profundus tendon by resecting a tendon fragment. The defects were bridged either with a cell-scaffold construct in the experimental group ( n= 20) or with scaffold material alone in the control group ( n= 20). Specimens were harvested at 8, 12, and 14 weeks postrepair for gross and histologic examination and for biomechanical analysis. In the experimental group, a cordlike tissue bridging the tendon defect was formed at 8 weeks postrepair. At 14 weeks, the engineered tendons resembled the natural tendons grossly in both color and texture. Histologic examination at 8 weeks showed that the neo-tendon contained abundant tenocytes and collagen; most collagen bundles were randomly arranged. The undegraded polyglycolic acid fibers surrounded by inflammatory cells were also observed. At 12 weeks, tenocytes and collagen fibers became longitudinally aligned, with good interface healing to normal tendon. At 14 weeks, the engineered tendons displayed a typical tendon structure hardly distinguishable from that of normal tendons. Biomechanical analysis demonstrated increased breaking strength of the engineered tendons with time, which reached 83 percent of normal tendon strength at 14 weeks. In the control group, polyglycolic acid constructs were mostly degraded at 8 weeks and disappeared at 14 weeks. However, the breaking strength of the scaffold materials accounted for only 9 percent of normal tendon strength. The results of this study indicated that tendon tissue could be engineered in vivo to bridge a tendon defect. The engineered tendons resembled natural tendons not only in gross appearance and histologic structure but also in biomechanical properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12360068     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000025290.49889.4D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  33 in total

Review 1.  Tissue engineering for tendon repair.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Bagnaninchi; Ying Yang; Alicia J El Haj; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The effects of growth and differentiation factor 5 on bone marrow stromal cell transplants in an in vitro tendon healing model.

Authors:  M Hayashi; C Zhao; K-N An; P C Amadio
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2011-01-31

3.  Assessment of essential characteristics of two different scaffolds for tendon in situ regeneration.

Authors:  Markus U Wagenhäuser; Matthias F Pietschmann; Denitsa Docheva; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Human iPSC-derived neural crest stem cells promote tendon repair in a rat patellar tendon window defect model.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yequan Wang; Erfu Liu; Yanjun Sun; Ziwei Luo; Zhiling Xu; Wanqian Liu; Li Zhong; Yonggang Lv; Aijun Wang; Zhenyu Tang; Song Li; Li Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Heparinized collagen sutures for sustained delivery of PDGF-BB: Delivery profile and effects on tendon-derived cells In-Vitro.

Authors:  Mousa Younesi; Baris Ozgur Donmez; Anowarul Islam; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  The role of engineered tendon matrix in the stemness of tendon stem cells in vitro and the promotion of tendon-like tissue formation in vivo.

Authors:  Jianying Zhang; Bin Li; James H-C Wang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Tendon healing: an overview of physiology, biology, and pathology of tendon healing and systematic review of state of the art in tendon bioengineering.

Authors:  Sebastian A Müller; Atanas Todorov; Patricia E Heisterbach; Ivan Martin; Martin Majewski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of tenocytes and mesenchymal stem cells seeded on biodegradable scaffolds in a full-size tendon defect model.

Authors:  M F Pietschmann; B Frankewycz; P Schmitz; D Docheva; B Sievers; V Jansson; M Schieker; P E Müller
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Tendon regeneration in human and equine athletes: Ubi Sumus-Quo Vadimus (where are we and where are we going to)?

Authors:  Jan H Spaas; Deborah J Guest; Gerlinde R Van de Walle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Characterization of differential properties of rabbit tendon stem cells and tenocytes.

Authors:  Jianying Zhang; James H-C Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.