PURPOSE: Rotator cuff tears are challenging as the rate of re-ruptures remains high. Thus, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed. Tendon in situ regeneration (TSR) attempts to produce cell-scaffold constructs in vitro, which can produce tendinous tissue of high quality after replantation. Therefore, it is essential to find suitable scaffolds that can provide acceptable biofunctionality and biocompatibility. This study compares characteristics of scaffolds for in situ regeneration: a polyglycolic acid/PDS scaffold (PP-sca) (Ethisorb, Ethicon, Germany) and a collagen sponge (col-spo) (TissueTek, Germany) with a basal strengthening membrane. METHODS: Tendon-derived cells (TDCs) were isolated from the long head of the biceps tendon. Gene expression for collagen type I, collagen type III, decorin, scleraxis and tenomodulin was analysed in the third cell passage. Cell proliferation in cell seeded scaffolds was tested using a WST-1 assay. In addition, the tensile strength of both scaffolds was measured using a universal-testing machine (Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany). RESULTS: The results from this study indicate a genotypic drift during the in vitro cultivation of the TDCs. The PP-sca showed good biofunctional results, including low initial loss of cells after cell seeding. The proliferation rates were approximately equal in each type of scaffold. The col-spo provided superior tensile strength compared with the PP-sca (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Overall, the col-spo seems to be more suitable for TSR. It may become a clinical alternative in the future to achieve more satisfying results, concerning function and pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Experimental study/case series, Level IV.
PURPOSE: Rotator cuff tears are challenging as the rate of re-ruptures remains high. Thus, new therapeutic strategies need to be developed. Tendon in situ regeneration (TSR) attempts to produce cell-scaffold constructs in vitro, which can produce tendinous tissue of high quality after replantation. Therefore, it is essential to find suitable scaffolds that can provide acceptable biofunctionality and biocompatibility. This study compares characteristics of scaffolds for in situ regeneration: a polyglycolic acid/PDS scaffold (PP-sca) (Ethisorb, Ethicon, Germany) and a collagen sponge (col-spo) (TissueTek, Germany) with a basal strengthening membrane. METHODS: Tendon-derived cells (TDCs) were isolated from the long head of the biceps tendon. Gene expression for collagen type I, collagen type III, decorin, scleraxis and tenomodulin was analysed in the third cell passage. Cell proliferation in cell seeded scaffolds was tested using a WST-1 assay. In addition, the tensile strength of both scaffolds was measured using a universal-testing machine (Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany). RESULTS: The results from this study indicate a genotypic drift during the in vitro cultivation of the TDCs. The PP-sca showed good biofunctional results, including low initial loss of cells after cell seeding. The proliferation rates were approximately equal in each type of scaffold. The col-spo provided superior tensile strength compared with the PP-sca (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Overall, the col-spo seems to be more suitable for TSR. It may become a clinical alternative in the future to achieve more satisfying results, concerning function and pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Experimental study/case series, Level IV.
Authors: Sandra C Rodrigues; Christiane L Salgado; Abhishek Sahu; Monica P Garcia; Maria H Fernandes; Fernando J Monteiro Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Helen Razmjou; Aileen M Davis; Susan B Jaglal; Richard Holtby; Robin R Richards Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Justus P Beier; Dorothee Klumpp; Markus Rudisile; Roland Dersch; Joachim H Wendorff; Oliver Bleiziffer; Andreas Arkudas; Elias Polykandriotis; Raymund E Horch; Ulrich Kneser Journal: BMC Biotechnol Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 2.563
Authors: Matthias F Pietschmann; Markus U Wagenhäuser; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Andreas Ficklscherer; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 3.318