OBJECTIVE: A previous study reported a higher than normal density of dopamine D(2) receptors in psychotic mania but not in nonpsychotic mania. The purpose of this study was to further examine D(2) receptor density in a larger sample of nonpsychotic manic patients by using positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]raclopride. METHOD: Thirteen neuroleptic- and mood- stabilizer-naive patients with DSM-IV mania without psychotic features and 14 healthy comparison subjects underwent [(11)C]raclopride PET scans. Of the 13 patients, 10 were treated with divalproex sodium monotherapy. PET scans were repeated 2-6 weeks after commencement of divalproex sodium. D(2) receptor binding potential was calculated by using a ratio method with the cerebellum as the reference region. RESULTS: The [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential was not significantly different in manic patients than in the comparison subjects in the striatum. Treatment with divalproex sodium had no significant effect on the [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential in manic patients. There was no correlation between the D(2) binding potential and manic symptoms before or after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that D(2) receptor density is not altered in nonpsychotic mania and that divalproex sodium treatment does not affect D(2) receptor availability.
OBJECTIVE: A previous study reported a higher than normal density of dopamine D(2) receptors in psychotic mania but not in nonpsychotic mania. The purpose of this study was to further examine D(2) receptor density in a larger sample of nonpsychotic manicpatients by using positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]raclopride. METHOD: Thirteen neuroleptic- and mood- stabilizer-naive patients with DSM-IV mania without psychotic features and 14 healthy comparison subjects underwent [(11)C]raclopride PET scans. Of the 13 patients, 10 were treated with divalproex sodium monotherapy. PET scans were repeated 2-6 weeks after commencement of divalproex sodium. D(2) receptor binding potential was calculated by using a ratio method with the cerebellum as the reference region. RESULTS: The [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential was not significantly different in manicpatients than in the comparison subjects in the striatum. Treatment with divalproex sodium had no significant effect on the [(11)C]raclopride D(2) binding potential in manicpatients. There was no correlation between the D(2) binding potential and manic symptoms before or after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that D(2) receptor density is not altered in nonpsychotic mania and that divalproex sodium treatment does not affect D(2) receptor availability.
Authors: Epolia Ramadan; Mireille Basselin; Ameer Y Taha; Yewon Cheon; Lisa Chang; Mei Chen; Stanley I Rapoport Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; David S Janowsky; Berend Olivier; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Jared W Young; Mark A Geyer Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Camila O Arent; Samira S Valvassori; Gabriel R Fries; Laura Stertz; Camila L Ferreira; Jéssica Lopes-Borges; Edemilson Mariot; Roger B Varela; Felipe Ornell; Flávio Kapczinski; Monica L Andersen; João Quevedo Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; John R Shapiro; Ann T Summerfelt; Sarah K Keedy; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Nash N Boutros; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant Thaker; Brett A Clementz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 13.382