Literature DB >> 12358566

To screen or not to screen--that is the question in perinatal depression.

Anne E Buist1, Bryanne E W Barnett, Jeannette Milgrom, Sherryl Pope, John T Condon, David A Ellwood, Phillip M Boyce, Marie-Paule V Austin, Barbara A Hayes.   

Abstract

Significant perinatal distress and depression affects 14% of women, producing short and long term consequences for the family. This suggests that measures for early detection are important, and non-identification of these women may exacerbate difficulties. Screening provides an opportunity to access large numbers of women and facilitate pathways to best-practice care. A valid, reliable, economical screening tool (the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) is available. Arguments against screening pertain largely to lack of evidence about the acceptability of routine use of the EPDS during pregnancy and the postnatal period, and inadequate evidence regarding outcomes and cost-effectiveness. To address these concerns, the National Postnatal Depression Prevention and Early Intervention Program will evaluate outcomes of screening in terms of acceptability, cost-effectiveness, access and satisfaction with management in up to 100 000 women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12358566     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04866.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  18 in total

1.  Addressing the Missing Part of Evidence-based Practice: The Importance of Respecting Clinical Judgment in the Process of Adopting a New Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Vered Ben-David; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Ron Tompkins
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.835

2.  Comparative performance of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening antepartum depression.

Authors:  Qiuyue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Marta Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Pedro J García; Elena Sánchez; Yasmin V Barrios; Gregory E Simon; David C Henderson; Swee May Cripe; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Factors associated with perceived stress and stressful life events in pregnant women: findings from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Maureen Heaman; Deshayne Fell; Susie Dzakpasu; Beverley Chalmers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Perinatal depression: a review of US legislation and law.

Authors:  Ann M Rhodes; Lisa S Segre
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Best practices: community-based postpartum depression screening: results from the CARE study.

Authors:  June Andrews Horowitz; Christine A Murphy; Katherine E Gregory; Joanne Wojcik
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Anxiety disorders in pregnancy.

Authors:  Bavanisha Vythilingum
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  Antenatal psychosocial assessment for reducing perinatal mental health morbidity.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Austin; Susan R Priest; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

8.  Antenatal depression and adversity in urban South Africa.

Authors:  Thandi van Heyningen; Landon Myer; Michael Onah; Mark Tomlinson; Sally Field; Simone Honikman
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Relationship of postnatal depressive symptoms to infant temperament, maternal expectations, social support and other potential risk factors: findings from a large Australian cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John G Eastwood; Bin B Jalaludin; Lynn A Kemp; Hai N Phung; Bryane E W Barnett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Measuring the risk factors for postpartum depression: development of the Japanese version of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R-J).

Authors:  Mari Ikeda; Kiyoko Kamibeppu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.