Literature DB >> 12356439

Representation of orientation in the somatosensory system.

Steven S Hsiao1, John Lane, Paul Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

In this paper we discuss how orientation is represented and transformed in the somatosensory system. Information about stimulus orientation plays an important role in sensory processing. In touch it provides critical information about how stimuli are positioned on the hand, which is important for grasping and lifting objects. It also provides important information about tactile shape. Psychophysical studies show that humans have a high capacity to discriminate the orientation of shapes and gratings indented into the finger pad. Further, these studies demonstrate that orientation discrimination is a reliable and stable method for assessing tactile spatial acuity. Neurophysiological studies suggest that orientation information is processed by the slowly adapting type 1 (SA1) afferent system. While orientation is poorly represented in the responses of individual afferent fibers, it is well represented in the population response properties of peripheral SA1 afferents and in the responses of central neurons in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortex. In S2, neurons with orientation selective and orientation non-selective responses tend to have large receptive fields that span multiple pads on multiple digits. Neurons in S2 that are orientation selective have similar tuning functions on different finger pads. These neurons may provide position-invariant responses or may be responsible for integrating features across hands, which is important for haptic object recognition of large shapes from the hand. Neurophysiological studies in trained animals show that the responses of about 85% of the neurons in S2 are affected by the animals focus of attention and that attention to the orientation of a bar modifies both the mean firing rate (i.e. gain) of neurons encoding orientation information and the degree of synchronous firing between pairs of neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356439     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00160-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Li Min Chen; Anna Wang Roe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Receptive field properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: representation of orientation on different finger pads.

Authors:  Paul J Fitzgerald; John W Lane; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatiotemporal receptive fields of peripheral afferents and cortical area 3b and 1 neurons in the primate somatosensory system.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Takashi Yoshioka; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Analogous intermediate shape coding in vision and touch.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Anitha Pasupathy; Paul J Fitzgerald; Steven S Hsiao; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The vision of Hsiao on somatosensation.

Authors:  Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Rapid geometric feature signaling in the simulated spiking activity of a complete population of tactile nerve fibers.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Xinyue Xia; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Representation of tactile curvature in macaque somatosensory area 2.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Charles E Connor; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Sensorimotor control of contact force.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.