Literature DB >> 12355191

Body mass scaling of frontal area in competitive cyclists not using aero-handlebars.

Daniel P Heil1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the scaling relationship between body mass ( m(b)) and projected frontal area ( A(P)) in competitive male cyclists using traditional drop-style handlebars. A group of 21 male cyclists [mean (SD) m(b) 74.4 (7.2) kg, height 1.82 (0.06) m, age 23.6 (5.1) years] had A(P) determined from photographs taken while seated on their own racing bicycles in four body positions: (1) stem position; (2) brake hoods position; (3) drops position; (4) traditional aero-position. For each position, A(P) for the body of the cyclist (Body A(P)), as well as the cyclist and his bicycle (Total A(P)), were determined. Body A(P) was significantly smaller than Total A(P) in all four positions by a nearly constant bicycle A(P) of 0.117-0.124 m(2). Using multiple log-linear regression analysis procedures, prediction equations were developed for both Body A(P) and Total A(P) (dependent variables) using a cluster of binary-coded variables to indicate body position and m(b) as independent variables ( n=88 observations). The regression analysis revealed that Body A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.720 power [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.585-0.855], which did not differ significantly from the +0.762 exponent reported previously for Body A(P) whilst using aero-handlebars. In contrast, Total A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.594 power (95% CI: 0.468-0.720) which was significantly lower than +0.762 exponent reported previously. The lower exponent for Total A(P) is explained by the nearly constant contribution of the bicycle A(P) to Total A(P) (mean bicycle A(P)=0.122 m(2)). These data help to explain the determinants of A(P) and aerodynamic drag in competitive male cyclists who use the traditional body postures.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12355191     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0662-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  6 in total

1.  Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling.

Authors:  Piero Mognoni; Pietro E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Body size as a determinant of the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude.

Authors:  Daniel P Heil
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effects of bicycle frame geometry on muscle activation and power during a wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  Mark D Ricard; Patrick Hills-Meyer; Michael G Miller; Timothy J Michael
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  The energetics of cycling on Earth, Moon and Mars.

Authors:  Stefano Lazzer; Luca Plaino; Guglielmo Antonutto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Reply to letter to editor: stereotypes of athletes' use of performance enhancing products.

Authors:  Nkaku Kisaalita; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Field-measured drag area is a key correlate of level cycling time trial performance.

Authors:  James E Peterman; Allen C Lim; Ryan I Ignatz; Andrew G Edwards; William C Byrnes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.