Literature DB >> 12355145

Predictors of aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents.

Susan E Langmore1, Kimberly A Skarupski, Pil S Park, Brant E Fries.   

Abstract

Aspiration pneumonia is a serious problem for the elderly institutionalized person, often requiring transfer to a hospital and a lengthy stay there. It is associated with a high mortality rate and is very costly to the health care system. The current study sought to determine the key predictors of aspiration pneumonia in a nursing home population with the hope that health care providers could identify those residents at highest risk and focus more efforts on prevention of this serious disease. A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was done, using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nursing home assessment data for three states (New York, Mississippi, Maine) from 1993 to 1994 (N = 102842). Nursing home residents were aged 65+. Standardized MDS summary scales and their component items were used, including: the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, the cognitive performance scale (CPS), and the Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs). Results of these analyses showed the prevalence of pneumonia among this population was 3% (n = 3118). Results from the logistic regression models indicated 18 significant predictors of aspiration pneumonia. The strongest to weakest predictors of pneumonia were, respectively, suctioning use, COPD, CHF, presence of feeding tube, bedfast, high case mix index, delirium, weight loss, swallowing problems, urinary tract infections, mechanically altered diet, dependence for eating, bed mobility, locomotion, number of medications, and age, while both CVA and tracheotomy care were inversely predictive of pneumonia. The emergence of these significant predictors suggested a different pathogenesis of pneumonia in the elderly nursing home resident from the acute care patient or the outpatient. Nursing home residents have chronic medical conditions that gradually lead to "decompensation" in functional status, nutritional status, and pulmonary clearance. Dysphagia and aspiration are common complications of their medical conditions and may slowly worsen as their status deteriorates. Alternatively, a sudden adverse event may dramatically increase the amount aspirated or the ability to resist infection and lead to sudden decompensation. Clinical staff must identify residents with dysphagia and aspiration and work to prevent decline in functional status in all residents. They must be aware of the dangers of adverse events that lead to sudden inactivity or illness and increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Prevention of this disease whenever possible will reduce costs, improve health outcomes, and improve our quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12355145     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-002-0072-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  51 in total

1.  Association between severity of dysphagia and survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Samantha E Shune; Lucy Hynds Karnell; Michael P Karnell; Douglas J Van Daele; Gerry F Funk
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Validity of conducting clinical dysphagia assessments for patients with normal to mild cognitive impairment via telerehabilitation.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ward; Shobha Sharma; Clare Burns; Deborah Theodoros; Trevor Russell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Dysphagia in stroke patients.

Authors:  S Singh; S Hamdy
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Time-dependent rheology of starch thickeners and the clinical implications for dysphagia therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Dewar; Malcolm J Joyce
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  An observational study of adults with Down syndrome eating independently.

Authors:  Christina H Smith; Yafen Teo; Sarah Simpson
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  What information do UK speech and language therapists use when making oral versus nonoral feeding recommendations for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia?

Authors:  Naomi Cocks; Hazel Ferreira
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  A framework for understanding shared substrates of airway protection.

Authors:  Michelle Shevon Troche; Alexandra Essman Brandimore; Juliana Godoy; Karen Wheeler Hegland
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Impact of dysphagia severity on clinical decision making via telerehabilitation.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ward; Clare L Burns; Deborah G Theodoros; Trevor G Russell
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Relationship Between Laryngeal Sensory Deficits, Aspiration, and Pneumonia in Patients with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Asako Kaneoka; Jessica M Pisegna; Haruhi Inokuchi; Rumi Ueha; Takao Goto; Takaharu Nito; Cara E Stepp; Michael P LaValley; Nobuhiko Haga; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Treatment of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Authors:  Ian J. Cook
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.