Literature DB >> 12354600

Usefulness of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Hiroyuki Kato1, Hiroyuki Kuwano, Masanobu Nakajima, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Minako Yoshikawa, Norihiro Masuda, Minoru Fukuchi, Ryokuhei Manda, Katsuhiko Tsukada, Noboru Oriuchi, Keigo Endo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we retrospectively assessed the performance of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) compared with computed tomography (CT) and esophagography for assessing the response of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: We studied 10 patients with thoracic esophageal SCC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Tumor response was assessed by CT, endoscopy, esophagography and FDG-PET before and after neoadjuvant treatment.
RESULTS: Assessment of the rate of decrease in standardized uptake value (SUV) revealed a partial response (more than 50% decrease) in 5 (50%) of the patients, and assessment of length decrease of FDG uptake showed a partial response in 9 (90%) of the patients. Comparison of the histological response and the rate of decrease of various parameters revealed significant associations between histological response and tumor length (P <0.05), SUV after neoadjuvant therapy (P <0.05), and reduction in the extent of FDG uptake (P <0.01). However histological response was not significantly correlated with the rate of reduction of SUV, for both CT and esophagography.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET may be of considerable value for predicting the pathologic response of esophageal SCC to neoadjuvant therapy. Despite assessment of SUV before neoadjuvant therapy, low FDG uptake after therapy and reduction in the extent of FDG uptake may provide a reliable assessment of the response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354600     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00932-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  19 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography in pediatric radiation oncology: integration in the treatment-planning process.

Authors:  Matthew J Krasin; Melissa M Hudson; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-01-27

2.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

4.  Positron emission tomography's changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

5.  Staging with PET and the "Will Rogers" effect: redefining prognosis and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Positron Emission Tomography's Utility in Esophageal Cancer Management.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Impact on Radiological and Pathological Response with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Its Effect on Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Thoracic Esophagus.

Authors:  Abhinav Dewan; S K Sharma; A K Dewan; Ruparna Khurana; Manoj Gupta; Anjali Pahuja; Himanshu Srivastava; Rupal Sinha
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-03

8.  (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography immediately after chemoradiotherapy predicts prognosis in patients with locoregional postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Jingu; Tomohiro Kaneta; Kenji Nemoto; Ken Takeda; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Hisanori Ariga; Masashi Koto; Toru Sakayauchi; Yoshihiro Takai; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Nonsurgical approaches to esophageal malignancy.

Authors:  Darius Sorbi; David E Fleischer
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.