Literature DB >> 12352454

Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedures in children.

Travis Clark1, John C Pope, mark C Adams, Nancy Wells, John W Brock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical techniques that provide adequate urinary and fecal continence in children with neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction are becoming increasingly used. We reviewed our experience and discuss factors that influence outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2000, 65 stomal procedures were performed in 47 patients. For the urinary continent catheterizable channel we used appendix in 60% of cases, a continent bladder tube in 20%, a Yang-Monti tube in 16% and ureter in 4%. For the antegrade continence enema continent catheterizable channel we used appendix in 85% of cases, a Yang-Monti tube in 5% and a cecal tube in 10%. In the 19 patients who underwent simultaneous Mitrofanoff and antegrade continence enema procedures the urinary continent catheterizable channel was appendix in 21%, a Yang-Monti tube in 32% and continent vesicostomy in 47%. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on compliance status. In addition, percentile body weight for age was evaluated.
RESULTS: Stomal continence was achieved in 63 of the 65 cases (97%). Of the patients who underwent the antegrade continence enema procedure 95% achieved continence via the rectum. Except for ureter stenosis rates according to continent catheterizable channel type did not differ greatly, namely 19% for appendix, 11% for the Yang-Monti tube, 22% for the bladder tube, 50% for ureter and 0% for the cecal tube. Infectious complications developed in 16 patients and 4 had stones. The rates of infection (p = 0.004), stomal stenosis (p = 0.001) and revision (p = 0.004) were statistically lower in the compliant group and the stone formation rate showed a trend favoring the compliant group (p = 0.11). No significant difference was noted for incontinence. Percentile weight predicted a higher rate of stomal stenosis with the highest rate of stomal stenosis overall in the greater than 100th percentile group.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mitrofanoff and antegrade continence enema procedures are reliable and effective. Proper patient selection and surgical technique with a tension-free anastomosis are essential. The choice of tissue for constructing the continent catheterizable channel is not as important as patient compliance, age and possibly body habitus. This report reinforces the importance of careful screening, and rigorous preoperative and postoperative teaching to achieve overall patient success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352454     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000028619.08733.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  [Catheterizable continence mechanisms for various urinary diversion reservoirs: serosa lined and tapered ileum].

Authors:  P Anheuser; J Kranz; S Rausch; G Fechner; S C Müller; M Braun; J Steffens; T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Malone antegrade colonic irrigation: ileal neoappendicostomy is the preferred procedure in adults.

Authors:  Guillaume Portier; Laurent Ghouti; Sylvain Kirzin; Monique Chauffour; Frank Lazorthes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Neuropathic bladders: Investigation and treatment through their lifetime.

Authors:  Peter D Metcalfe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Augmented bladders and urinary diversions.

Authors:  Peter Metcalfe; Shuba De; Greg Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Outcomes of urinary diversion in children with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Lisa A Merenda; Theresa Duffy; Randal R Betz; Mary Jane Mulcahey; Gregory Dean; Michel Pontari
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Utility of Mitrofanoff as bladder draining tool: A single center experience in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Omar Zia Syed; Amna Haider Bukhari; Abdul Ahad Ehsan Sheikh; Umair Syed Mahmud; Faheemullah Khan; Ijaz Hussain; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-26

7.  MACE or caecostomy button for idiopathic constipation in children: a comparison of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  S Cascio; M E Flett; M De la Hunt; A M Barrett; B Jaffray
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Adolescent urology: developing lifelong care for congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Dan Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  5 years after an ACE: what happens then?

Authors:  Clara Chong; Neil Featherstone; Shazia Sharif; Abraham Cherian; Peter Cuckow; Imran Mushtaq; Paolo De Coppi; Kate Cross; Joseph Curry
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  The antegrade continence enema procedure and total anorectal reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew P Zbar
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.