Literature DB >> 12352078

Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience.

Savitri Sharma1, Derek Y Kunimoto, Usha Gopinathan, Sreedharan Athmanathan, Prashant Garg, Gullapalli N Rao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of Gram and potassium hydroxide with calcofluor white (KOH+CFW) stains in the diagnosis of early and advanced microbial keratitis, a retrospective analysis of comparative data from a prospectively collected database was done.
METHODS: Patients with nonviral microbial keratitis seen at L.V. Prasad Eye Institute between February 1991 and December 1998 were included in the study. The type of bacteria seen on Gram stain was determined from 251 corneal scrapings from patients with early keratitis and 841 corneal scrapings from patients with advanced keratitis. The presence of fungi in corneal scrapings was determined by KOH+CFW stain of 114 and 363 scrapings from patients with early and advanced keratitis, respectively. The smear findings were compared with culture results to analyze specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of the staining techniques.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of Gram stain in the detection of bacteria was 36.0% in early and 40.9% in advanced keratitis cases; however, the specificity was higher in both groups (84.9% and 87.1%, respectively). Comparatively, the sensitivity and specificity of fungal detection were higher using KOH+CFW in early (61.1% and 99.0%, respectively) as well as advanced keratitis (87.7% and 83.7%, respectively). Predictive values were high for KOH+CFW in fungus detection, while they were poor for Gram stain in bacteria detection. In advanced keratitis cases, the false positives were higher in fungal detection (16.3%) than in bacterial detection (10.3%), while the false negatives were significantly higher in bacterial detection compared with fungal detection (59.1% versus 12.3%, p< 0.0001). In early keratitis, on the other hand, both false positives and false negatives for bacterial detection were significantly higher than fungal detection.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisions can reliably be based on KOH+CFW stain of corneal scrapings for initiation of antifungal therapy in mycotic keratitis. The results of Gram stain, on the other hand, have limited value in therapeutic decisions for bacterial keratitis. Therefore, the search for a better modality for early and efficient diagnosis of bacterial keratitis needs to continue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12352078     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  28 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of infectious diseases of the eye.

Authors:  S Sharma
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Initial therapy for suppurative microbial keratitis in Iraq.

Authors:  Faiz Al-Shakarchi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and standard microbiological techniques in presumed bacterial corneal ulcers.

Authors:  Anita Panda; Tajinder Pal Singh; Geeta Satpathy; Meenakshi Wadhwani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Trends in bacterial and fungal keratitis in South India, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Prajna Lalitha; Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Geetha Manoharan; Muthiah Srinivasan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Manoranjan Das; Sean S D'Silva; Travis C Porco; Jeremy D Keenan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Role of in vivo confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis.

Authors:  Ye Elaine Wang; Tudor Cosmin Tepelus; Laura A Vickers; Elmira Baghdasaryan; Wei Gui; Ping Huang; John A Irvine; SriniVas Sadda; Hugo Y Hsu; Olivia L Lee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Microbiological diagnosis of infective keratitis: comparative evaluation of direct microscopy and culture results.

Authors:  M J Bharathi; R Ramakrishnan; R Meenakshi; S Mittal; C Shivakumar; M Srinivasan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Current Thoughts in Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Zubair Ansari; Darlene Miller; Anat Galor
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2013-09-01

8.  Prevalence and spectrum of bacterial co-infection during fungal keratitis.

Authors:  J C Pate; D B Jones; K R Wilhelmus
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Corneal infection in Shandong peninsula of China: a 10-year retrospective study on 578 cases.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Pan; Tao Jiang; Hai Zhu; Peng-Peng Liu; Zhan-Yu Zhou; Alexander J Mao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: experience of over a decade.

Authors:  Usha Gopinathan; Savitri Sharma; Prashant Garg; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.