Prajna Lalitha1, Namperumalsamy V Prajna2, Geetha Manoharan1, Muthiah Srinivasan2, Jeena Mascarenhas2, Manoranjan Das2, Sean S D'Silva2, Travis C Porco3, Jeremy D Keenan4. 1. Department of Ocular Microbiology, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India. 2. Department of Cornea and External Diseases, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India. 3. Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, USA Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, USA Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. 4. Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, USA Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the trends in microbiological organisms identified from corneal scrapings from patients with infectious keratitis at a tertiary care medical centre in South India. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the microbiology laboratory at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India, from 2002 until 2012. We identified the microbiological causes of all corneal ulcers from the culture and smear results, and assessed for trends in bacterial and fungal keratitis over time. RESULTS: Of 23 897 corneal patients with ulcer with a corneal smear from 2002 to 2012 a fungal organism was identified in 34.3%, a bacterial organism in 24.7% and no organism in 38.3%. During this period, the annual number of keratitis cases due to bacteria decreased from 677 to 412, and the annual number due to fungus increased from 609 to 863. In analyses accounting for the total number of outpatients seen each year, the decline in number of smears positive for bacteria was statistically significant (p<0.001) but the increase in the number positive for fungus was not (p=0.73). The relative frequency of individual bacterial or fungal organisms remained relatively stable over this time. CONCLUSIONS: At a tertiary eye care centre in South India, there has been a reduction in the numbers of smear-positive bacterial keratitis over the past 11 years. This decline likely reflects economic development in India and increased access to antibiotics. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the trends in microbiological organisms identified from corneal scrapings from patients with infectious keratitis at a tertiary care medical centre in South India. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the microbiology laboratory at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India, from 2002 until 2012. We identified the microbiological causes of all corneal ulcers from the culture and smear results, and assessed for trends in bacterial and fungal keratitis over time. RESULTS: Of 23 897 cornealpatients with ulcer with a corneal smear from 2002 to 2012 a fungal organism was identified in 34.3%, a bacterial organism in 24.7% and no organism in 38.3%. During this period, the annual number of keratitis cases due to bacteria decreased from 677 to 412, and the annual number due to fungus increased from 609 to 863. In analyses accounting for the total number of outpatients seen each year, the decline in number of smears positive for bacteria was statistically significant (p<0.001) but the increase in the number positive for fungus was not (p=0.73). The relative frequency of individual bacterial or fungal organisms remained relatively stable over this time. CONCLUSIONS: At a tertiary eye care centre in South India, there has been a reduction in the numbers of smear-positive bacterial keratitis over the past 11 years. This decline likely reflects economic development in India and increased access to antibiotics. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Muthiah Srinivasan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Prajna Lalitha; David V Glidden; Kathryn J Ray; Kevin C Hong; Catherine E Oldenburg; Salena M Lee; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-10
Authors: Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Jeena Mascarenhas; Tiruvengada Krishnan; P Ravindranath Reddy; Lalitha Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; C M Vaitilingam; Kevin C Hong; Salena M Lee; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-06
Authors: A K Leck; P A Thomas; M Hagan; J Kaliamurthy; E Ackuaku; M John; M J Newman; F S Codjoe; J A Opintan; C M Kalavathy; V Essuman; C A N Jesudasan; G J Johnson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: M Jayahar Bharathi; R Ramakrishnan; R Meenakshi; S Padmavathy; C Shivakumar; M Srinivasan Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Ye Elaine Wang; Tudor Cosmin Tepelus; Laura A Vickers; Elmira Baghdasaryan; Wei Gui; Ping Huang; John A Irvine; SriniVas Sadda; Hugo Y Hsu; Olivia L Lee Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Patricia R Taylor; Sanhita Roy; Evan C Meszaros; Yan Sun; Scott J Howell; Charles J Malemud; Eric Pearlman Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Charlotte Shan Ho; Rashmi Deshmukh; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.775