Literature DB >> 12351591

Standard versus intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in small-cell lung cancer: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial-08923.

Andrea Ardizzoni1, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen, Pieter E Postmus, Erica Buchholz, Bonne Biesma, Hanna Karnicka-Mlodkowska, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Jos Burghouts, Jan P Van Meerbeeck, Steven Gans, Catherine Legrand, Channa Debruyne, Giuseppe Giaccone, Christian Manegold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact on survival of increasing dose-intensity (DI) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated SCLC patients were randomized to standard CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, for five cycles) or intensified CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 55 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 125 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] 5 micro g/kg/d on days 4 to 13 every 2 weeks, for four cycles). Projected cumulative dose was almost identical on the two arms, whereas projected DI was nearly 90% higher on the intensified arm. Two hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The first 163 patients were also randomized (2 x 2 factorial design) to prophylactic antibiotics or placebo to assess their impact on preventing febrile leukopenia (FL). This report focuses on chemotherapy DI results.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 54 months, 216 deaths have occurred. Actually delivered DI on the intensified arm was 70% higher than on the standard arm. Intensified CDE was associated with more grade 4 leukopenia (79% v 50%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (44% v 11%), anorexia, nausea, and mucositis. FL and number of toxic deaths were similar on the two arms. The objective response rate was 79% for the standard arm and 84% for the intensified arm (P =.315). Median survival was 54 weeks and 52 weeks, and the 2-year survival rates were 15% and 18%, respectively (P =.885).
CONCLUSION: A 70% increase of CDE actual DI does not translate into an improved outcome in SCLC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351591     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  A way forward on the medically appropriate use of white cell growth factors.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 3.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer 2013.

Authors:  M Dómine Gómez; T Morán Bueno; A Artal Cortés; J Remon Masip; P Lianes Barragán
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Extensive disease small cell lung cancer dose-response relationships: implications for resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  David J Stewart; Constance Johnson; Adriana Lopez; Bonnie Glisson; Jay M Rhee; B Nebiyou Bekele
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Achieving full-dose, on-schedule administration of ACE chemotherapy every 14 days for the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Pirker; E Ulsperger; J Messner; K Aigner; B Forstner; P Bacon; V Easton; T Skacel
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 6.  Targeting angiogenesis in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michalis Stratigos; Alexios Matikas; Alexandra Voutsina; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Vassilis Georgoulias
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08

Review 7.  Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Sofia Baka; Babita Jyoti; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Progress and problems in the application of focused ultrasound for blood-brain barrier disruption.

Authors:  Natalia Vykhodtseva; Nathan McDannold; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 9.  Treatment options for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Todd Wolf; Heidi H Gillenwater
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Management of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kristen Keon Ciombor; Caio Max S Rocha Lima
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.