Literature DB >> 12351535

Ovarian function with a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring.

Titia M T Mulders1, Thom O M Dieben, Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NuvaRing is a combined contraceptive vaginal ring designed for 3 weeks continuous use followed by a 1 week ring-free period. The present study evaluated ovarian function in women who were instructed to either adhere to, or deviate from, the recommended regimen of use.
METHODS: In this open-label, randomized study, 45 women aged between 18 and 35 years used NuvaRing for one cycle in which the ring was used according to the recommended regimen. Women in group A (n = 15) then continued with a 'normal' 3 week period of ring use after which the restoration of ovarian function-i.e. the time to ovulation-for each woman was determined by daily vaginal ultrasound and serum hormone levels. For women in group B (n = 15), the second cycle consisted of only 3 consecutive days of ring use, after which each woman was monitored until ovulation. Women in group C (n = 15) were not permitted to start a second 'normal' cycle until a follicle with a diameter of 13 mm was observed by vaginal ultrasound; subsequently, the development of these follicles during the second cycle of ring use was monitored daily.
RESULTS: Irrespective of the length of the second cycle, 3 weeks (group A) versus 3 days (group B), a new cohort of follicles needed to be recruited and the time to ovulation after ring removal was similar (19 versus 17 days). The median time needed to develop a follicle up to 13 mm in diameter (group C) was 11 days (range 8-21 days); none of the women ovulated after insertion of the second ring.
CONCLUSION: NuvaRing is a highly effective, reversible method of hormonal contraception. Ovulation, at least until the stage of a 13 mm dominant follicle, is prevented and as little as 3 consecutive days of NuvaRing use interferes with follicle growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351535     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Matched-pairs analysis of ovarian suppression during oral vs. vaginal hormonal contraceptive use.

Authors:  Kelsey A Petrie; Anu H Torgal; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  Effect of missed combined hormonal contraceptives on contraceptive effectiveness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Maria W Steenland; Dalia Brahmi; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing).

Authors:  Devorah R Wieder; Lynn Pattimakiel
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-11-12

Review 4.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Intravaginal rings as delivery systems for microbicides and multipurpose prevention technologies.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Meredith R Clark; Jennifer A Hurlburt; Gustavo F Doncel
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-10-21

6.  Development of Hormonal Intravaginal Rings: Technology and Challenges.

Authors:  Fojan Rafiei; Hadi Tabesh; Shayan Farzad; Farah Farzaneh; Maryam Rezaei; Fateme Hosseinzade; Khosrow Mottaghy
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Efficacy of combined contraceptive vaginal ring versus oral contraceptive pills in achieving hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis suppression in egg donor in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Robin Lynn Thomas; Lisa Marie Halvorson; Bruce Richard Carr; Kathleen Marie Doody; Kevin John Doody
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2013-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.