| Literature DB >> 34276064 |
Fojan Rafiei1, Hadi Tabesh1, Shayan Farzad2, Farah Farzaneh3, Maryam Rezaei1, Fateme Hosseinzade1, Khosrow Mottaghy4.
Abstract
Intravaginal rings (IVRs) are minimally invasive polymeric devices specifically designed to be used for the sustained and prolonged release of various type of drugs such as hormones. One of the benefits of using topical drug delivery systems (e.g., IVRs) is the fact that systemic drug delivery may cause drug resistance due to elevated drug levels. Topical drug delivery also provides higher concentrations of the drug to the target site and has fewer side effects. In addition, when a drug is administered vaginally, the hepatic first-pass effect is avoided, resulting in higher absorption. Contraception and treatments for specific diseases such as endometriosis and hormone deficiencies can be improved by the administration of hormones via an IVR. This article aims to classify and compare various designs of commercially available and non-commercial hormonal IVRs and to analyze their performance. Current challenges affecting the development of IVRs are investigated, and proposed solutions are discussed. A comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE/PubMed and of commercial product data of IVRs was performed, and the materials, designs, performance, and applications (e.g., contraception, endometriosis, estrogen deficiency and urogenital atrophy) of hormonal IVRs were thoroughly evaluated. Most hormonal IVRs administer female sex hormones, i.e., estrogen and progestogens. In terms of material, IVRs are divided into 3 main groups: silicone, polyurethane, and polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate IVRs. As regards their design, there are 4 major designs for IVRs which strongly affect their performance and the timing and rate of hormone release. Important challenges include reducing the burst release and maintaining the bioavailability of hormones at their site of action over a prolonged period of administration as well as lowering production costs. Hormonal IVRs are a promising method which could be used to facilitate combination therapies by administering multiple drugs in a single IVR while eliminating the side effects of conventional drug administration methods. IVRs could considerably improve women's quality of life all over the world within a short period of time. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: contraception; endometriosis; estrogen deficiency; hormones; intravaginal ring; urogenital atrophy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34276064 PMCID: PMC8277443 DOI: 10.1055/a-1369-9395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd ISSN: 0016-5751 Impact factor: 2.915
Fig. 1Classification of hormones according to their chemical nature.
Table 1 Comparison of important physicochemical and biological properties of polymers generally used for IVR manufacture.
| Property | Material | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone | PU | EVA | |
| Biocompatibility |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Biostability |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Reshaping capabilities |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Crystallinity |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Low cost |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Transparency |
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
| Low weight |
✗
|
✓
|
✗
|
| Hydrophilic nature |
✗
|
✗
|
✗
|
| Recycling |
✗
|
✓
|
✓
|
Fig. 2Intravaginal ring designs.
Fig. 3a Single-drug matrix IVR, b multi-drug segmented matrix IVR, c single-drug core IVR, d single-drug incomplete core IVR, e multi-drug continuous core continuous RCM, f multi-drug segmented core continuous RCM, g multi-drug segmented core segmented RCM, h sandwich IVR, i tablet/pod/rod insert IVR, j core-matrix (hybrid) IVR.
Fig. 4Cumulative release profile of a matrix (homogeneous dispersion) IVRs, b core reservoir and pod IVRs, and c sandwich reservoir IVRs.
Table 2 List of commercially available hormonal IVRs.
| IVR Name | Company | Hormone | Release rate | IVR material | IVR type | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANNOVERA ® | Therapeutics MD | Nestorone (segesterone acetate) and ethinylestradiol | segesterone acetate: 150 µg | silicone elastomer | pod | contraception |
|
| Estring | Pfizer Inc., USA | Estradiol | 7.5 µg/day | silicone elastomer | core reservoir | urogenital atrophy |
|
| Femring | Warner Chilcott/ Actavis, UK | estradiol acetate | 0.5 µg/day | silicone elastomer | core reservoir | urogenital atrophy, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), contraception |
|
| Fertiring ® | Silesia Laboratories | progesterone | variable | silicone elastomer | insoluble matrix | contraception |
|
| NuvaRing | NV Organon Co in the Netherlands/Merck & Co., USA | etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol | 8 µg/day | EVA | core reservoir | contraception |
|
| Ornibel | Exeltis Healthcare | etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol | 8 µg/day | PU core and EVA external membrane | core reservoir | contraception |
|
| Progering | Silesia Laboratories | progesterone | 10 mg/day | silicone elastomer | insoluble matrix | contraception |
|
Table 3 List of non-commercial hormonal IVRs.
| Hormones | IVR materials | IVR type | Application | Release rate | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levonorgestrel | silicone elastomer | core reservoir | contraception | 20 µg/day |
|
| Nestorone | elastomer LSR (liquid silicone rubber) | core reservoir | contraception | 50, 75, or 100 µg/day |
|
| Nestorone and ethinylestradiol | silicone elastomer | rod insert | contraception | 10, ~ 13.5 and 7.5 µg/day |
|
Fig. 5Diagram showing applications for IVRs.
Table 4 Major challenges in development of hormonal IVRs and proposed solutions.
| Challenge | Possible solutions |
|---|---|
| Reduction of burst release | Additional membranes Modification of membrane thickness Drug released at a prearranged time |
| Long-term drug delivery | Osmotically driven pumps Matrices with controllable swelling Diffusion rates Erosion rates (using water-repellent surface) Non-uniform drug-loading profiles Multilayered matrices |
| Sustained bioavailability | Changes in the drug release rate when faced with different stimuli |
| Maximizing efficacy | Using selective hormone receptors Using microbicides Using the appropriate polymer for the required API |
| Cost reduction | Low-cost techniques Low-cost materials such as bio-based polymers |