Literature DB >> 12351254

Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation.

Giorgio Della Rocca1, Gabriella M Costa, Cecilia Coccia, Livia Pompei, Pierangelo Di Marco, Paolo Pietropaoli.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this study, during lung transplantation, we analyzed a conventional preload index, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and a new preload index, the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), derived from the single-indicator transpulmonary dilution technique (PiCCO System), with respect to stroke volume index (SVIpa). We also evaluated the relationships between changes (Delta) in ITBVI and PAOP and DeltaSVIpa during lung transplantation. The reproducibility and precision of all cardiac index measurements obtained with the transpulmonary single-indicator dilution technique (CIart) and with the pulmonary artery thermodilution technique (CIpa) were also determined. Measurements were made in 50 patients monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter and with a PiCCO System at six stages throughout the study. Changes in the variables were calculated by subtracting the first from the second measurement (Delta(1)) and so on (Delta(1) to Delta(5)). The linear correlation between ITBVI and SVIpa was significant (r(2)=0.41; P < 0.0001), whereas PAOP poorly correlated with SVIpa (r(2) = -0.01). Changes in ITBVI correlated with changes in SVIpa (Delta(1), r(2) = 0.30; Delta(2), r(2) = 0.57; Delta(4), r(2) = 0.26; and Delta(5), r(2) = 0.67), whereas PAOP failed. The mean bias between CIart and CIpa was 0.15 l. min(-1). m(-2) (1.37). In conclusion, ITBVI is a valid indicator of cardiac preload and may be superior to PAOP in patients undergoing lung transplantation. IMPLICATIONS: The assessment of intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) by the transpulmonary single-indicator technique is a useful tool in lung transplant patients, providing a valid index of cardiac preload that may be superior to pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. However, more prospective, randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the role and limitations of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12351254     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of an advanced minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring with a continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring during lung transplantation.

Authors:  Roland Tomasi; Stephan Prueckner; Stephan Czerner; Renè Schramm; Gerhard Preissler; Bernhard Zwißler; Vera von Dossow-Hanfstingl
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Effects of volumetric vs. pressure-guided fluid therapy on postoperative inflammatory response: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tamas Szakmany; Ildiko Toth; Zsolt Kovacs; Tamas Leiner; Andras Mikor; Tamas Koszegi; Zsolt Molnar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jamal A Alhashemi; Maurizio Cecconi; Giorgio della Rocca; Maxime Cannesson; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2010-09

4.  Stroke volume variation as a guide to fluid administration in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Jain; Amitabh Dutta
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  [Assessment of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Toby E Reynolds; Nawaf Al-Subaie; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Central venous catheter use in severe malaria: time to reconsider the World Health Organization guidelines?

Authors:  Josh Hanson; Sophia Wk Lam; Sanjib Mohanty; Shamshul Alam; Md Mahtab Uddin Hasan; Sue J Lee; Marcus J Schultz; Prakaykaew Charunwatthana; Sophie Cohen; Ashraf Kabir; Saroj Mishra; Nicholas Pj Day; Nicholas J White; Arjen M Dondorp
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Transpulmonary thermodilution-derived cardiac function index identifies cardiac dysfunction in acute heart failure and septic patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Simon Ritter; Alain Rudiger; Marco Maggiorini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Lees; Mark Hamilton; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Should we stop using the determination of central venous pressure as a way to estimate cardiac preload?

Authors:  Johann Smith Cerón Arias; Manuel Felipe Muñoz Nañez
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.