Literature DB >> 12350431

The auditory C-process of spectral profile analysis.

S J Jones1, N Perez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We here review the findings of several experiments, aimed at clarifying the functional role of the human auditory cortex in the processing of complex sound mixtures.
METHODS: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials were recorded to abrupt changes in the pitch or timbre of continuous complex tones (synthesized musical instrument sounds). Changes were made at intervals of 0.5-4.5 s while the subjects read a magazine.
RESULTS: The main response was a P1/N1/P2 complex which was maximal at the vertex and symmetrically distributed, consistent with origin in the supratemporal cortices of both hemispheres. To distinguish them from the conventional responses to brief pure tones, the potentials were named CP1 (c. 55 ms), CN1 (90 ms) and CP2 (165 ms). Responses to changes of pitch, where all the spectral components changed frequency, and to changes of timbre, where the frequencies remained the same but their energy levels changed, were very similar to one another. The response amplitudes were little affected by the magnitude of frequency changes in the range 6-100%, but were strongly influenced by the rate at which changes occurred (requiring at least 4 s for full recovery) and by the breadth of the changing frequency spectrum (the upper partials of the tone in sum contributing more than the fundamental). When the C-potentials were made refractory by a high rate of pitch changes (16/s) within a narrow frequency range, responses could still be elicited by infrequently interspersed changes of timbre. When the tones were split into their high and low partials, the responses to change in the two frequency bands combined roughly algebraically.
CONCLUSIONS: The responses appear to represent a cortical process concerned with analysing the distribution of sound energy across the frequency spectrum ('spectral profile analysis'). This may be an important stage in the analysis of complex sound mixtures and in the perception of sound quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350431     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00219-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Sensitivity of human auditory evoked potentials to the harmonicity of complex tones: evidence for dissociated cortical processes of spectral and periodicity analysis.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Auditory cortical N100 in pre- and post-synaptic auditory neuropathy to frequency or intensity changes of continuous tones.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr; Shrutee Bhatt; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Comparator and non-comparator mechanisms of change detection in the context of speech--an ERP study.

Authors:  Ilan Laufer; Michiro Negishi; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.