Literature DB >> 12350254

Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans.

Daniel Nettle1.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that, in contemporary populations, tall men have greater reproductive success than shorter men. This appears to be due to their greater ability to attract mates. To our knowledge, no comparable results have yet been reported for women. This study used data from Britain's National Child Development Study to examine the life histories of a nationally representative group of women. Height was weakly but significantly related to reproductive success. The relationship was U-shaped, with deficits at the extremes of height. This pattern was largely due to poor health among extremely tall and extremely short women. However, the maximum reproductive success was found below the mean height for women. Thus, selection appears to be sexually disruptive in this population, favouring tall men and short women. Over evolutionary time, such a situation tends to maintain sexual dimorphism. Men do not use stature as a positive mate-choice criterion as women do. It is argued that there is good evolutionary reason for this, because men are orientated towards cues of fertility, and female height, being positively related to age of sexual maturity, is not such a cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350254      PMCID: PMC1691114          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Tall men have more reproductive success.

Authors:  B Pawlowski; R I Dunbar; A Lipowicz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The estimation of the heritability of anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; N Das; P Chatterjee
Journal:  Appl Human Sci       Date:  1999-01

3.  Fertility, physique, and intensity of selection.

Authors:  A Vetta
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  Social background, adult body-height and health.

Authors:  K Silventoinen; E Lahelma; O Rahkonen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Childhood environment, intergenerational mobility, and adult health--evidence from Swedish data.

Authors:  A M Nyström Peck
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction.

Authors:  W E Hensley
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  1994

7.  Physical activity, obesity, height, and the risk of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D S Michaud; E Giovannucci; W C Willett; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; C S Fuchs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Aug 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Determinants of sciatica and low-back pain.

Authors:  M Heliövaara; M Mäkelä; P Knekt; O Impivaara; A Aromaa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Tallness and overweight during childhood have opposing effects on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  L Hilakivi-Clarke; T Forsén; J G Eriksson; R Luoto; J Tuomilehto; C Osmond; D J Barker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of Long Bone Growth in Vertebrates; It Is Time to Catch Up.

Authors:  Alberto Roselló-Díez; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate.

Authors:  Rebecca Sear; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

Review 4.  Measuring selection in contemporary human populations.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Sean G Byars; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Douglas Ewbank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women.

Authors:  B Pawłowski; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2005-06

6.  Height and reproductive success : How a Gambian population compares with the west.

Authors:  Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-12

7.  Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle; Helen Clegg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape.

Authors:  Alexandre Courtiol; Sandrine Picq; Bernard Godelle; Michel Raymond; Jean-Baptiste Ferdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Growth and puberty in German children: is there still a positive secular trend?

Authors:  Bettina Gohlke; Joachim Woelfle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  How humans differ from other animals in their levels of morphological variation.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.