Literature DB >> 12322859

Phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole.

Chloe C Gottlieb1, James A Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progressive nuclear sclerosis is a known complication of macular hole surgery that hinders patients' recovery to their best visual acuity postoperatively. We report the visual outcome, complications and efficacy of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens (IOL) insertion and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for patients with cataract undergoing macular hole surgery.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 32 consecutive patients (36 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification with insertion of a polymethylmethacrylate lens into the capsular bag and pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling in one session for repair of idiopathic macular hole. Patients were assessed between February 1998 and August 2001.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 70 (range 52 to 83) years, and 25 (78%) were women. The median duration of the holes before surgery was 8.3 months; in 19 eyes (53%) the duration was 6 months or less. Twenty eyes (56%) had stage 3 holes. The preoperative vision was 20/200 or worse in 29 eyes (80%). The mean grade of nuclear sclerosis was 2.4. The average length of follow-up after surgery was 11 (range 1.5 to 37) months. Primary hole closure was achieved in 28 eyes (78%). In five of the remaining eight cases the patient consented to a second procedure, which was successful in four cases, for a final closure rate of 89%. Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved by 2 lines or more in 22 eyes (61%). Of the 32 eyes with final closure, 11 (34%) attained a visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 25 (78%) had an acuity of 20/100 or better. The most common complication was posterior capsular opacification (27 eyes [75%]), an expected complication when perfluoropropane or other gases are used for tamponade.
INTERPRETATION: The results are comparable to those with standard macular hole surgery. Combined surgery is reliable and safe; the benefits support its use as a routine procedure for patients with cataract undergoing macular hole repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12322859     DOI: 10.1016/s0008-4182(02)80022-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0008-4182            Impact factor:   1.882


  5 in total

1.  20-gauge and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: comparison of complications and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  R Krishnan; C Tossounis; Y Fung Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy vs cataract surgery following vitrectomy.

Authors:  Paris G Tranos; Bruce Allan; Miltiadis Balidis; Athanasios Vakalis; Solon Asteriades; George Anogeianakis; Magda Triantafilla; Nikolaos Kozeis; Panagiotis Stavrakas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A phacovitrectomy with a clear corneal incision for a full-thickness macular hole.

Authors:  Nam Ju Kim; Hyeong Gon Yu
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09

Review 4.  Complications of Macular Peeling.

Authors:  Mónica Asencio-Duran; Beatriz Manzano-Muñoz; José Luis Vallejo-García; Jesús García-Martínez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Combined pars plana lensectomy/vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole repair without postoperative prone positioning.

Authors:  Nicola G Ghazi; Armand Daccache; Robert Knape; James S Tiedeman
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.