Literature DB >> 12296638

Regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes in traumatic brain injury: experience from the tirilazad trials.

Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven1, Ewout W Steyerberg, Elana Farace, J Dik F Habbema, Lawrence F Marshall, Andrew I R Maas.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Regional differences have been shown in patient characteristics and case management within multiple unselected series of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). One might expect that such regional heterogeneity would be small in a more selected population of a randomized clinical trial. The goal of this study was to examine what regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes exist between continents and among countries within a patient population included in a randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Data were extracted from two concurrently conducted randomized clinical trials of the drug tirilazad; the designs of these studies were similar. The studies included 1701 patients with severe and 476 patients with moderate TBI. Differences were primarily investigated between studies performed in Europe and North America, but also among European regions and between Canada and the United States. Associations among regions and outcomes (6-month mortality rate and Glasgow Outcome Scale scores) were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Comparisons between continents and among regions within Europe showed differences in the distribution of patient ages, causes of injury, and several clinical characteristics (motor score, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, intracranial pressure [ICP]). and findings on computerized tomography scans. Secondary referrals occurred 2.5 times more frequently in Europe. Within Europe secondary referral was mainly associated with an increased proportion of patients with mass lesions (46% in the European Study compared with 40% in the North American Study). Therapy for lowering ICP was more frequently applied in North America. After adjustments for case mix and management, mortality and unfavorable outcomes were significantly higher in Europe (odds ratios = 1.58 and 1.46, respectively). Significant differences in outcome between regions within Europe or within North America were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of a strict study protocol, considerable differences in patient characteristics and case management exist between continents and among countries, reflecting variations in social, cultural, and organizational aspects. Outcomes of TBI may be worse in Europe compared with North America, but this finding requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12296638     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.3.0549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  23 in total

1.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Refractory intracranial hypertension and "second-tier" therapies in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nino Stocchetti; Clelia Zanaboni; Angelo Colombo; Giuseppe Citerio; Luigi Beretta; Laura Ghisoni; Elisa Roncati Zanier; Katia Canavesi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned?

Authors:  Christos M Tolias; M Ross Bullock
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-01

4.  Admission of patients with severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to specialized ICU facilities: a search for triage criteria.

Authors:  Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The Outcome of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America.

Authors:  Robert H Bonow; Jason Barber; Nancy R Temkin; Walter Videtta; Carlos Rondina; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Victor Alanis; Gustavo La Fuente; Arturo Lavadenz; Roberto Merida; Manuel Jibaja; Luis Gonzáles; Antonio Falcao; Ricardo Romero; Sureyya Dikmen; James Pridgeon; Randall M Chesnut
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Traumatic brain injury: simple data collection will improve the outcome.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Miguel Arango; Tim Clayton; Phil Edwards; Edward Komolafe; Stuart Poccock; Ian Roberts; Haleema Shakur; Ewout Steyerberg; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-12

8.  Effects of Glasgow Outcome Scale misclassification on traumatic brain injury clinical trials.

Authors:  Juan Lu; Gordon D Murray; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Hester Lingsma; Nino Mushkudiani; Sung Choi; Andrew I R Maas; Anthony Marmarou
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  A historical analysis of severe head injury.

Authors:  Gregorio R Boto; Pedro A Gómez; Javier De la Cruz; Ramiro D Lobato
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Toward an international initiative for traumatic brain injury research.

Authors:  Patrizia Tosetti; Ramona R Hicks; Elizabeth Theriault; Anthony Phillips; Walter Koroshetz; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.