Literature DB >> 12269444

Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus more contagious than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus in a surgical intensive care unit?

Menno R Vriens1, Ad C Fluit, Annet Troelstra, Jan Verhoef, Chris van der Werken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands, the prevalence of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates has been kept to less than 1% by using active screening programs and isolation. At the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), an active screening program for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) was implemented in 1986. Between 1992 and 2001, only 6 patients with MRSA were admitted to the surgical ICU. However, 4 of these 6 strains were able to spread to 23 other patients and 15 healthcare workers (HCWs). We were surprised by the epidemic behavior of these strains and wondered whether this was exceptional for S. aureus or whether methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was also spreading in the ICU.
DESIGN: A 2-month, prospective, observational study to investigate the incidence and spread of MSSA in the surgical ICU of UMCU and historical data collected during a 10-year period regarding MRSA.
SETTING: A 10-bed surgical ICU in a 1,042-bed teaching hospital.
RESULTS: Weekly swabs revealed the presence of MSSA in 11 (24%) of 45 patients and 16 (22%) of 72 HCWs. Of all 4,105 patient-HCW contacts, there were only 21 episodes in which both the patient and the HCW were found to carry MSSA. With the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, no identical strains could be identified.
CONCLUSION: In our surgical ICU, MRSA seems to spread more easily than MSSA, probably because of selection under antibiotic pressure or a still unknown intrinsic factor within MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12269444     DOI: 10.1086/502094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  8 in total

1.  [Epidemiology of and preventive measures for multiresistant pathogens].

Authors:  E-B Kruse; M Dettenkofer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Dissemination of the CDC's Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection rates.

Authors:  Elaine L Larson; Dave Quiros; Susan X Lin
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  [Positive screening for MRSA--clinical consequences?].

Authors:  M Neumaier; I Kappstein; M A Scherer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Evaluation of the DiversiLab system for detection of hospital outbreaks of infections by different bacterial species.

Authors:  A C Fluit; A M Terlingen; L Andriessen; R Ikawaty; R van Mansfeld; J Top; J W Cohen Stuart; M A Leverstein-van Hall; C H E Boel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Implementing the MRSA recommendations made by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) of 1999 - current considerations by the DGKH Management Board.

Authors:  Arne Simon; Martin Exner; Axel Kramer; Steffen Engelhart
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2009-04-09

6.  Control of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; Margreet C Vos; William R Jarvis; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Effect of duplicate isolates of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on antibiogram data.

Authors:  Rebecca T Horvat; Neil E Klutman; Melinda K Lacy; Dennis Grauer; Marsha Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  The state of the science.

Authors:  Barry M Farr
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.