Literature DB >> 14532191

Effect of duplicate isolates of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on antibiogram data.

Rebecca T Horvat1, Neil E Klutman, Melinda K Lacy, Dennis Grauer, Marsha Wilson.   

Abstract

Duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates were analyzed to determine the impact of multiple isolates from the same patient on annual antibiogram data. During a 6-year period (1996 to 2001), 3,227 patients with 4,844 S. aureus isolates were evaluated. A total of 39% of patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 860) and 23% of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (n = 2,367) infections had duplicate isolates. Cumulative data show that 91% of the patients during this 6-year period with duplicate isolates (2 to 13 duplicates/year) did not switch between MSSA and MRSA but retained the original S. aureus strain whether it was MSSA or MRSA. Rates of MRSA were calculated for each year by using all isolates and then eliminating duplicates. The impact of duplicate MRSA and MSSA isolates was evaluated by using the ratio of isolates per patient such that ratios of >1.0 indicate >1 isolate per patient. The 6-year ratio for MRSA was 1.90 isolates/patient, and the ratio for MSSA was 1.35. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted in the MRSA rates in 4 of 6 years when duplicate isolates were removed. Common phenotypic antibiogram patterns were compared for all MRSA isolates during the 6-year period, and 64% were of a single antibiogram phenotype. Eighty-eight percent of patients with duplicate MRSA isolates had phenotypically identical multiple isolates. The rate of MRSA differs when duplicate isolates are removed from the antibiogram data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532191      PMCID: PMC254318          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4611-4616.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Antibiotic resistance: effect of different criteria for classifying isolates as duplicates on apparent resistance frequencies.

Authors:  K P Shannon; G L French
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Secrets of success of a human pathogen: molecular evolution of pandemic clones of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Duarte C Oliveira; Alexander Tomasz; Hermínia de Lencastre
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 3.  Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A S Haddadin; S A Fappiano; P A Lipsett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Antibiograms.

Authors:  K Lamp
Journal:  Pharm Pract Manag Q       Date:  1996-07

5.  Repeat antimicrobial susceptibility testing of identical isolates.

Authors:  R B Thomson; T M File; R A Burgoon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Impact of antibiotic resistance on clinical outcomes and the cost of care.

Authors:  M S Niederman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Overview of resistance in the 1990s.

Authors:  T M File
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Resistance rather than virulence selects for the clonal spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: implications for MRSA transmission.

Authors:  B Shopsin; B Mathema; X Zhao; J Martinez; J Kornblum; B N Kreiswirth
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.431

Review 9.  The commonality of risk factors for nosocomial colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus, gram-negative bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and Candida.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1991.

Authors:  A L Panlilio; D H Culver; R P Gaynes; S Banerjee; T S Henderson; J S Tolson; W J Martone
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.254

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nationwide antibiogram analysis using NCCLS M39-A guidelines.

Authors:  Antonia Zapantis; Melinda K Lacy; Rebecca T Horvat; Dennis Grauer; Brian J Barnes; Brian O'Neal; Rick Couldry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of trends of resistance rates over 3 years calculated from results for all isolates and for the first isolate of a given species from a patient.

Authors:  Sang-Oh Lee; Yong Kyun Cho; Sue-Yun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Shin Young Park; Yiel-Hae Seo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics.

Authors:  James Q Boedicker; Liang Li; Timothy R Kline; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and fluoroquinolone use.

Authors:  Conan MacDougall; Spencer E Harpe; J Patrick Powell; Christopher K Johnson; Michael B Edmond; Ron E Polk
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data--The Influence of Different Parameters in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Rebekka Kohlmann; Sören G Gatermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.