Literature DB >> 12269300

Determining the influence of Gaussian blurring on inversion effects with talking faces.

Sharon M Thomas1, Timothy R Jordan.   

Abstract

Perception of visual speech and the influence of visual speech on auditory speech perception is affected by the orientation of a talker's face, but the nature of the visual information underlying this effect has yet to be established. Here, we examine the contributions of visually coarse (configural) and fine (featural) facial movement information to inversion effects in the perception of visual and audiovisual speech. We describe two experiments in which we disrupted perception of fine facial detail by decreasing spatial frequency (blurring) and disrupted perception of coarse configural information by facial inversion. For normal, unblurred talking faces, facial inversion had no influence on visual speech identification or on the effects of congruent or incongruent visual speech movements on perception of auditory speech. However, for blurred faces, facial inversion reduced identification of unimodal visual speech and effects of visual speech on perception of congruent and incongruent auditory speech. These effects were more pronounced for words whose appearance may be defined by fine featural detail. Implications for the nature of inversion effects in visual and audiovisual speech are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12269300     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in superior temporal sulcus connectivity during perception of noisy audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Audrey R Nath; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visibility of speech articulation enhances auditory phonetic convergence.

Authors:  James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Influences of selective adaptation on perception of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  James W Dias; Theresa C Cook; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-05

4.  Perceived synchrony for realistic and dynamic audiovisual events.

Authors:  Ragnhild Eg; Dawn M Behne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-02

5.  Partial Visual Loss Affects Self-reports of Hearing Abilities Measured Using a Modified Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Rajiv Raman; Brian C J Moore; Silvia Cirstea; Sarika Gopalakrishnan; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-12

6.  Dorsal-movement and ventral-form regions are functionally connected during visual-speech recognition.

Authors:  Kamila Borowiak; Corrina Maguinness; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.