Literature DB >> 12243512

Clinical utility of serial serum c-erbB-2 determinations in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Tanja Fehm1, Gerhard Gebauer, Wolfram Jäger.   

Abstract

To evaluate the ability of serum c-erbB-2 protein to (1) indicate occult and manifest metastases and (2) reflect response to first-line therapy, serial serum c-erbB-2 measurements were performed in a retrospective series of 52 primary breast cancer patients who had developed metastatic disease during follow-up. The results were compared with CA 15-3. Preoperatively, 31% (16/52) of the primary breast cancer patients had elevated c-erbB-2 concentrations. The CA 15-3 positivity rate was 13% (7/52). After surgery, 10 of the 52 patients showed either stable but highly elevated or rising c-erbB-2 serum levels indicating serum c-erbB-2 producing minimal residual disease. Increasing CA 15-3 concentrations were seen in only three patients. Elevated serum c-erbB-2 levels predicted manifest metastases in 27 and 50% of the patients at 6 and 3 months, respectively, prior to clinical diagnosis. CA 15-3 was less sensitive. Only 16 and 32% of the patients had increased CA 15-3 serum concentrations at 6 and 3 months, respectively, prior to clinical detection. The positivity rates of c-erbB-2 and CA 15-3 were similar when metastases were clinically diagnosed. Elevated c-erbB-2 concentrations were found in 62% (32/52). The sensitivity of CA 15-3 was 56% (29/52). The association between serum profiles and response to first-line therapy was evaluated in detail for 45 patients. Serial c-erbB-2 and CA 15-3 measurements reflected disease course in 24 and 27 patients, respectively. The serum profiles of c-erbB-2 and CA 15-3 were similar in 17 patients. In summary, our results suggest that serial determinations of serum c-erbB-2 are useful to monitor breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12243512     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019601022456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of tumor markers (HER-2/neu oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3) in patients with locoregional breast cancer: prognostic value.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Jose M Augé; Jose M Escudero; Xavier Filella; Gabriel Zanon; Jaume Pahisa; Blanca Farrus; Montserrat Muñoz; Martin Velasco
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-04-02

Review 2.  Challenges in the clinical utility of the serum test for HER2 ECD.

Authors:  Lian Lam; Nicholas McAndrew; Marla Yee; Ting Fu; Julia C Tchou; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-03

3.  Serum HER2 as a response indicator to various chemotherapeutic agents in tissue HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kong; Do Hoon Lee; Eun Sook Lee; Susan Park; Keun Seok Lee; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Serum HER-2: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for detecting metastatic recurrence in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Patricia Diana Sørensen; Erik Hugger Jakobsen; Jonna Skov Madsen; Eva Brix Petersen; Rikke Fredslund Andersen; Birthe Østergaard; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Label-free Growth Receptor-2 Detection and Dissociation Constant Assessment in Diluted Human Serum Using a Longitudinal Extension Mode of a Piezoelectric Microcantilever Sensor.

Authors:  Joseph A Capobianco; Wan Y Shih; Gregory P Adams; Wei-Heng Shih
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.460

6.  Label-free, all-electrical, in situ human epidermal growth receptor 2 detection.

Authors:  Joseph A Capobianco; Wan Y Shih; Qing-An Yuan; Gregory P Adams; Wei-Heng Shih
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.523

7.  Serum HER2 levels predict treatment efficacy and prognosis in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Wen-Jia Zuo; Min He; Hui Zheng; Yin Liu; Xi-Yu Liu; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Zhong-Hua Wang; Ren-Quan Lu; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-04

Review 8.  Recent advances in nanomaterials-based electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rajesh Ahirwar
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.833

9.  Relationships between serum HER2 ECD, TIMP-1 and clinical outcomes in Taiwanese breast cancer.

Authors:  Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Shin-Cheh Chen; Huei-Tzu Chien; Yi-Yin Jan; Tzu-Chieh Chao; Miin-Fu Chen; Ling-Ling Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Serum HER2 level measured by dot blot: a valid and inexpensive assay for monitoring breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Li-Duan Tan; Yuan-Yuan Xu; Yue Yu; Xiao-Qing Li; Ying Chen; Yu-Mei Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.