Literature DB >> 12238733

A source of error in self-reports of pap test utilization.

Judith Pizarro1, Tamera R Schneider, Peter Salovey.   

Abstract

The prevention and early detection of cervical cancer is achieved through women's regular use of Pap tests. Ascertaining adherence to Pap screening guidelines is often based on self-report, which may be unreliable. This study examined the reliability of Pap test self-reports and one potential source of error in them. We predicted that women having any gynecological examination (other than Pap tests) would falsely report having had a Pap test more often than women who had not experienced gynecological procedures. We compared self-reported Pap test utilization with medical records among 161 low-income women. Women with no Pap test in their medical record but who had experienced other gynecological procedures falsely reported a Pap test significantly more often than those women who actually received a Pap test or who had not received any gynecological procedure. Confusion over what type of gynecological procedures these women received could result in their under-utilization of Pap tests. Further, these findings question the validity of study findings based only on self-reported outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12238733     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019888627113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  13 in total

1.  Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M R Conaway; P R Lyna; W Rakowski; C T Woods-Powell; I Tessaro; K S Yarnall; L T Barber
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.

Authors:  E D Paskett; C M Tatum; D W Mack; H Hoen; L D Case; R Velez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population.

Authors:  P G McGovern; N Lurie; K L Margolis; J S Slater
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Accuracy of women's self-report of their last Pap smear.

Authors:  J A Sawyer; J A Earp; R H Fletcher; F F Daye; T M Wynn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Why women still die from cervical cancer.

Authors:  S Masood
Journal:  J Fla Med Assoc       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep

6.  Do chart reviews and interviews provide the same information about breast and cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  S Whitman; L Lacey; D Ansell; E H Chen; J Dell; C W Phillips
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories.

Authors:  S D Walter; E A Clarke; J Hatcher; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies.

Authors:  A C Marcus; L A Crane; C P Kaplan; A E Reading; E Savage; J Gunning; G Bernstein; J S Berek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy.

Authors:  L G Koss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Racial differences in the risk of invasive squamous-cell cervical cancer.

Authors:  C Schairer; L A Brinton; S S Devesa; R G Ziegler; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  18 in total

1.  Health insurance and cervical cancer screening among older women in Latin American and Caribbean cities.

Authors:  Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz; Luis F Velez; Maria E Camacho; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Kyriakos S Markides
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Inconsistencies between medical records and patient-reported recommendations for follow-up after abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  Stacey Slone; Carol White; Brent Shelton; Emily Van Meter; Christopher DeSimone; Nancy Schoenberg; Mark Dignan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Correlates of human papillomavirus vaccine coverage: a state-level analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Paul L Reiter; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Increasing cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese Americans: a community-based intervention trial.

Authors:  Grace X Ma; Carolyn Fang; Yin Tan; Ziding Feng; Shaokui Ge; Cuc Nguyen
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-05

5.  Evaluating the efficacy of lay health advisors for increasing risk-appropriate Pap test screening: a randomized controlled trial among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; John M McLaughlin; Amy M Lehman; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Jill M Oliveri
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women.

Authors:  Theresa L Byrd; Katherine M Wilson; Judith Lee Smith; Gloria Coronado; Sally W Vernon; Maria Eugenia Fernandez-Esquer; Beti Thompson; Melchor Ortiz; David Lairson; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Persistent disparities in pap test use: assessments and predictions for Asian women in the U.S., 1982-2010.

Authors:  Tzy-Chyi Yu; Chiu-Fang Chou; Pamela Jo Johnson; Andrew Ward
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2010-08

10.  Changes to cervical cancer prevention guidelines: effects on screening among U.S. women ages 15-29.

Authors:  Jillian T Henderson; Mona Saraiya; Gladys Martinez; Cynthia C Harper; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.