Literature DB >> 18511488

Health insurance and cervical cancer screening among older women in Latin American and Caribbean cities.

Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz1, Luis F Velez, Maria E Camacho, Kenneth J Ottenbacher, Kyriakos S Markides.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear use for cervical cancer screening and to estimate its association with type of health care insurance.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study using data from the Health, Well-Being and Aging in Latin America and the Caribbean Study (SABE). The sample includes 6357 women aged 60 and older from seven cities. The outcome was reporting a Pap smear for cervical cancer screening during the previous 2 years. Main independent variable was health care insurance. Covariates were demographic or socioeconomic variables, medical conditions and functional status.
RESULTS: Prevalence of Pap smear use across the seven cities ranged from 21% in Bridgetown to 45% in Mexico City. In a multivariate analysis of the combined sample, without Havana that has universal health care insurance, women with public insurance (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.71) or with no insurance (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.34) were less likely to have a Pap smear compared with women with private insurance. Also, women with no insurance were less likely to have a Pap smear (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.54) compared with women with any health insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, the prevalence of Pap smear use was lower than that reported for Hispanic populations in the United States. Overall, lack of health insurance or having public health insurance determined lower odds for having a Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18511488      PMCID: PMC4110445          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  47 in total

1.  Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup.

Authors:  R E Zambrana; N Breen; S A Fox; M L Gutierrez-Mohamed
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Trevor D Thompson; H Irene Hall; Pamela Logan; Robert J Uhler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Evaluation of the cervical cancer control program in Cuba.

Authors:  L Fernández Garrote; J J Lence Anta; E Cabezas Cruz; T Romero; R Camacho
Journal:  Bull Pan Am Health Organ       Date:  1996-12

4.  Breast and cervical carcinoma: the correlation of activity limitations and rurality with screening, disease incidence, and mortality.

Authors:  M Schootman; L J Fuortes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan; A M Budukh; R Rajkumar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Trends in cancer mortality in the Americas, 1970-2000.

Authors:  C Bosetti; M Malvezzi; L Chatenoud; E Negri; F Levi; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998-1999.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Robert J Uhler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Age-specific incidence of cancer in Kingston and St Andrew, Jamaica, 1993-1997.

Authors:  B Hanchard; G Blake; C Wolff; E Samuels; N Waugh; D Simpson; C Ramjit; K Mitchell
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 0.171

9.  Older Mexican-American women and cancer screening: progress toward targets for healthy people 2000.

Authors:  Z H Wu; S A Black; J L Freeman; K S Markides
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Evaluation of the cervical cancer screening programme in Mexico: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  M Hernández-Avila; E C Lazcano-Ponce; P A de Ruíz; I Romieu
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the black box: a systematic review of breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical screening among native and immigrant African-descent Caribbean populations.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Natalie L Tuck; Camille R Ragin; Benjamin A Spencer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

2.  Socioeconomic factors, immigration status, and cancer screening among Mexican American women aged 75 and older.

Authors:  Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz; Kyriakos S Markides
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2010-12

3.  Impact of payer status on treatment of cervical cancer at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Robert E Bristow; Pamela K Donohue; Norma F Kanarek; Cornelia L Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Psychosocial correlates of cervical cancer screening among older Hispanic women.

Authors:  Tamara J Cadet; Kathleen Stewart; Tenial Howard
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2016-12-14

5.  Socioeconomic determinants of cervical cancer screening in Latin America.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Natsu Fukui
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2013-03

6.  Cytology use for cervical cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Mariana Oliveira; Bárbara Peleteiro; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Perception, attitude and practices of women towards pelvic examination and Pap smear in Jamaica.

Authors:  Paul A Bourne; Christopher A D Charles; Cynthia G Francis; Neva South-Bourne; Racquel Peters
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-10

Review 8.  The challenge of cancer in middle-income countries with an ageing population: Mexico as a case study.

Authors:  Ajay Aggarwal; Karla Unger-Saldaña; Grant Lewison; Richard Sullivan
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 9.  Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Linda C O'Dwyer; Charlesnika T Evans; Megan McHugh; Lifang Hou; Melissa A Simon; Robert L Murphy; Neil Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening practices among women in Ghana: predictive factors and reproductive health policy implications from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health.

Authors:  Martin Amogre Ayanore; Martin Adjuik; Asiwome Ameko; Nuworza Kugbey; Robert Asampong; Derrick Mensah; Robert Kaba Alhassan; Agani Afaya; Mark Aviisah; Emmanuel Manu; Francis Zotor
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.809

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.