Literature DB >> 12237928

Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in cancer clinical trials: qualitative study of the perspectives of clinical research associates.

Eva Grunfeld1, Louise Zitzelsberger, Marjorie Coristine, Faye Aspelund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature continues to report low rates of accrual to cancer clinical trials. Previous studies have examined principally physician-related or patient-related barriers. Clinical research associates (CRAs) have a unique perspective on enrollment that has been explored very little. This study sought the views of CRAs on barriers and facilitators to accrual.
METHODS: Focus groups were held at six of eight tertiary cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Audiotapes of sessions were transcribed and subjected to content analysis by two of the authors. Emergent themes were identified. These themes are illustrated by representative quotes taken from the transcripts.
RESULTS: Factors that acted as barriers or facilitators were classified into physician-related, patient-related, or system-related factors. CRAs identified physician attitudes regarding patient participation as the principal physician-related barrier. Barriers, facilitators, and modifying factors that were related to patient involvement were discussed by CRAs. Patients seemed more knowledgeable about trials than in the past and were willing to participate. System factors were considered to have the greatest impact on the ability to accrue. CRAs identified increasing trial and pharmaceutical demands coupled with tight trial time lines. Time was seen as a diminishing resource. Greater demands not only affect specific clinical trial accrual but also affect general support for trials in the cancer center and hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: The impact of greater demands in a climate of decreasing health care resources is perceived by CRAs as having a negative affect on accrual. Consequently, the important process of translating potentially beneficial basic research findings into clinical practice is slowed. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10862

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12237928     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  47 in total

Review 1.  Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.

Authors:  Nicole J Caixeiro; Hei Lan Byun; Joseph Descallar; Janelle V Levesque; Paul de Souza; Cheok Soon Lee
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Use of mobile devices and the internet for multimedia informed consent delivery and data entry in a pediatric asthma trial: Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Kathryn Blake; Janet T Holbrook; Holly Antal; David Shade; H Timothy Bunnell; Suzanne M McCahan; Robert A Wise; Chris Pennington; Paul Garfinkel; Tim Wysocki
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  The relationship between eligibility criteria and adverse events in randomized controlled trials of hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  A Statler; T Radivoyevitch; C Siebenaller; A T Gerds; M Kalaycio; E Kodish; S Mukherjee; C Cheng; M A Sekeres
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Testing messages to encourage discussion of clinical trials among cancer survivors and their physicians: examining monitoring style and message detail.

Authors:  Lindsay R Duncan; Amy E Latimer; Elizabeth Pomery; Susan E Rivers; Michelle C Berotoli; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Preliminary evaluation of factors associated with premature trial closure and feasibility of accrual benchmarks in phase III oncology trials.

Authors:  Anneke T Schroen; Gina R Petroni; Hongkun Wang; Robert Gray; Xiaofei F Wang; Walter Cronin; Daniel J Sargent; Jacqueline Benedetti; Donald L Wickerham; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  A Review of Barriers to Minorities' Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Future Cancer Research.

Authors:  Ali Salman; Claire Nguyen; Yi-Hui Lee; Tawna Cooksey-James
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-04

7.  A prospective, observational cohort study comparing cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment between early adolescents/young adults and children.

Authors:  Stefanie M Thomas; Jemily Malvar; Henry Tran; Jared Shows; David R Freyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Unequal burden of disease, unequal participation in clinical trials: solutions from African American and Latino community members.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Laura A Siminoff; Elisabeth Pickelsimer; Arch G Mainous; Daniel W Smith; Vanessa A Diaz; Lea H Soderstrom; Melanie S Jefferson; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2013-02

9.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

10.  Recruiting low-income healthy women to research: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Celia P Kaplan; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.