Literature DB >> 12237188

Postsurgical pain outcome assessment.

Mark P Jensen1, Connie Chen, Andrew M Brugger.   

Abstract

Reliable and valid measures of pain are essential for conducting clinical trials of pain treatments. Perhaps the most important aspect of a pain measure's validity is its sensitivity, or ability to detect changes in pain over time and due to treatment. Several factors may affect a measure's sensitivity, including the complexity of the rating task for the measure, the number of pain intensity levels assessed by the measure, the dimension of pain assessed (e.g. pain intensity vs. pain relief), and the number of individual ratings (e.g. single rating vs. composite score) used to create the measure. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative sensitivity of three measures of outcome and a composite made up of all three measures for detecting analgesic effects in two samples of persons participating in a randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty-three patients who had undergone knee surgery and 124 women who had undergone a laparotomy were given one of three medications in the day after their surgery: morphine, ketorolac, or placebo. Two measures of pain intensity (a visual analog scale (VAS) and a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS)) were administered at baseline, and these measures plus a 5-point VRS of pain relief were administered at 16 additional time points up to 24 h following surgery. As predicted, we found variability in the sensitivity of the outcome measures used in these studies, with the 4-point VRS showing less sensitivity than the VAS or relief ratings. However, contrary to our prediction, a composite measure of outcome made up of all three measures was not consistently superior to the individual measures for detecting treatment effects. Finally, we found that pain relief ratings were related to, but also distinct from, change in pain intensity as measured by changes in pain intensity ratings from baseline to each postmedication assessment point. These findings have important implications for the assessment of pain in clinical trials. Copyright 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12237188     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00063-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].

Authors:  N H von der Höh; J Gulow; S K Tschöke; A Völker; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Analgesics for pain after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery: what is the evidence--a systematic review.

Authors:  E Montané; A Vallano; C Aguilera; X Vidal; J R Laporte
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rob Sillevis; Joshua Cleland; Madeleine Hellman; Kristina Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

4.  Effect of the CYP2D6*10 C188T polymorphism on postoperative tramadol analgesia in a Chinese population.

Authors:  GuoXiang Wang; Hui Zhang; FeiFang He; XiangMing Fang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Intraoperative Arthroscopic Cold Irrigation Solution Does Not Affect Postoperative Pain and Swelling.

Authors:  A Louise Fincher; G William Woods; Daniel P. O'Connor
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  A comparison of intravenous-based and epidural-based techniques for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kohki Nishikawa; Saori Kimura; Yuki Shimodate; Motohiko Igarashi; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Cocontraction of ankle dorsiflexors and transversus abdominis function in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Seung-Chul Chon; Joshua H You; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  [Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain. Physiology, risk factors and prevention].

Authors:  H J Gerbershagen
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Pain after spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures meeting.

Authors:  Thomas N Bryce; Cecilia Norrbrink Budh; Diana D Cardenas; Marcel Dijkers; Elizabeth R Felix; Nanna B Finnerup; Paul Kennedy; Thomas Lundeberg; J Scott Richards; Diana H Rintala; Philip Siddall; Eva Widerstrom-Noga
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Evaluation of the Iowa pain thermometer and other selected pain intensity scales in younger and older adult cohorts using controlled clinical pain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Keela Herr; Kevin F Spratt; Linda Garand; Li Li
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.