BACKGROUND: Quantitative evaluation of pulmonary perfusion using lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with atriopulmonary anastomosis (APA) or total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) or partial cavopulmonary connection (PCPC) is difficult because of preferential draining of the venae cavae to one lung. Scintigraphy is the gold standard. Phase-velocity MRI (PV-MRI) is a new technique for determining pulmonary perfusion. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether PV-MRI is more accurate than scintigraphy for quantitative evaluation of pulmonary perfusion ratios in patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 15 patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC (16+/-7 years old, 4 female). Twelve patients (15+/-8 years old, 3 female) with a single pulmonary blood source supplied by a subpulmonary ventricle, ensuring complete mixing of the radioactive tracer before entering the pulmonary circulation, served as controls. Pulmonary scintigraphy and PV-MRI were performed in all patients. Bland-Altman analysis showed a clinically unacceptable difference of 7.1% right pulmonary blood flow (27.2% upper and -13.0% lower limit of agreement) between the two methods in the study group. The two methods agreed excellently in the control group (difference, 1.6%; 4.0% upper and -7.2% lower limit of agreement), showing that the bad agreement in the study group was caused by the problems encountered using pulmonary scintigraphy in patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC. CONCLUSIONS: Because of preferential caval flow into either lung, PV-MRI is more accurate for evaluating pulmonary perfusion ratios than lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with Fontan-like circulation.
BACKGROUND: Quantitative evaluation of pulmonary perfusion using lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with atriopulmonary anastomosis (APA) or total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) or partial cavopulmonary connection (PCPC) is difficult because of preferential draining of the venae cavae to one lung. Scintigraphy is the gold standard. Phase-velocity MRI (PV-MRI) is a new technique for determining pulmonary perfusion. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether PV-MRI is more accurate than scintigraphy for quantitative evaluation of pulmonary perfusion ratios in patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 15 patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC (16+/-7 years old, 4 female). Twelve patients (15+/-8 years old, 3 female) with a single pulmonary blood source supplied by a subpulmonary ventricle, ensuring complete mixing of the radioactive tracer before entering the pulmonary circulation, served as controls. Pulmonary scintigraphy and PV-MRI were performed in all patients. Bland-Altman analysis showed a clinically unacceptable difference of 7.1% right pulmonary blood flow (27.2% upper and -13.0% lower limit of agreement) between the two methods in the study group. The two methods agreed excellently in the control group (difference, 1.6%; 4.0% upper and -7.2% lower limit of agreement), showing that the bad agreement in the study group was caused by the problems encountered using pulmonary scintigraphy in patients with APA, TCPC, or PCPC. CONCLUSIONS: Because of preferential caval flow into either lung, PV-MRI is more accurate for evaluating pulmonary perfusion ratios than lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with Fontan-like circulation.
Authors: Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Julio Garcia; Ramona Lorenz; Michael Rose; Varun Chowdhary; James Carr; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-06-27
Authors: K Klimes; H Abdul-Khaliq; S Ovroutski; W Hui; V Alexi-Meskishvili; B Spors; R Hetzer; R Felix; P E Lange; F Berger; M Gutberlet Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Kevin S Roman; Christian J Kellenberger; Saqba Farooq; Christopher K MacGowan; David L Gilday; Shi-Joon Yoo Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2004-10-15