Literature DB >> 12234512

Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty--the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels.

Ingolf A Türk1, John W Davis, Björn Winkelmann, Serdar Deger, Frank Richter, Michael D Fabrizio, Bernd Schönberger, Gerald H Jordan, Stefan A Loening.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Herein we report our experience of 49 consecutive pyeloplasties that were all laparoscopically performed with an intracorporeally sutured anastomosis. We describe the operative technique, complications and outcomes during a follow-up period of 1-53 months (mean 23.2 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients (28 women and 21 men) with a mean age of 34 years (range 6-65 years) underwent a laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty because of primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction with hydronephrosis in each case. The preoperative evaluation included an evaluation for pain, an excretory urography (IVP), renal scan and sometimes CT angiography to evaluate for crossing vessels. Follow-up studies included an IVP, renal scan and renal ultrasound 4 weeks postoperatively and every 3 months thereafter. Success was considered as improvement of the pain score and IVP (less hydronephrosis, visible UPJ and/or normalization of drainage) or absence of an obstructive pattern during the washout phase of a renal scan.
RESULTS: There was no conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 165 min (range 90-240 min). Blood loss was negligible. Crossing vessels were noted in 57.1% of the patients (28/49). Postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 days (range 3-6 days). One patient had a leakage of the anastomosis on postoperative day 1 and needed to undergo laparoscopic repair. The mean follow-up is 23.2 months (range 1-53 months). There was one single late failure. This patient later underwent an open revision of the laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In all other patients (48/49), the obstruction was resolved or significantly improved. The long-term success rate is 97.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasties compare favorably with those achieved by open pyeloplasties with less perioperative morbidity and discomfort. We do believe that laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with an intracorporeal anastomosis is the method of choice in the treatment of the UPJ obstruction in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12234512     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00315-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  34 in total

Review 1.  Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  András Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Matthew Gettman; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Reconstructive procedures in laparoscopic urology].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Wassilios Bentas; Marc Wolfram; Ronald Bräutigam; Michael Probst; Wolf-Dietrich Beecken; Dietger Jonas; Jochen Binder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Andreas Dellis; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty practice patterns in Canada.

Authors:  Thomas A A Skinner; Luke Witherspoon; Ali Dergham; Jeffrey E Warren; James Watterson; Brian Blew
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.

Authors:  Punit Bansal; Aman Gupta; Ritesh Mongha; Srinivas Narayan; Ranjit K Das; Malay Bera; Sudip C Chakraborty; Anup K Kundu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Single-knot running suture anastomosis (one-knot pyeloplasty) for laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: training model on a porcine bladder and clinical results.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Selcuk Guven; Ozgur Yaycioglu; Ozgur Ugurlu; Oner Sanli; Ali Serdar Gozen; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: the SGPGI experience.

Authors:  Ruchir Maheshwari; M S Ansari; Anil Mandhani; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

10.  Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction.

Authors:  Stephanie J Symons; Victor Palit; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jon J Cartledge; Anthony J Browning; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.