Literature DB >> 12231876

Ripening Physiology of Fruit from Transgenic Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Plants with Reduced Ethylene Synthesis.

H. J. Klee1.   

Abstract

The physiological effects of reduced ethylene synthesis in a transgenic tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) line expressing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase enzyme have been examined. Fruit from the transgenic line 5673 ripen significantly slower than control fruit when removed from the vine early in ripening. In contrast, fruit that remain attached to the plants ripen much more rapidly, exhibiting little delay relative to the control. Ethylene determinations on attached fruit revealed that there was significantly more internal ethylene in attached than detached fruit. The higher ethylene content can fully account for the observed faster on-the-vine ripening. All of the data are consistent with a catalytic role for ethylene in promoting many, although not all, aspects of fruit ripening. Biochemical analyses of transgenic fruit indicated no significant differences from controls in the levels of ACC oxidase or polygalacturonase. Because transgenic fruit are significantly firmer than controls, this last result indicates that other enzymes may have a significant role in fruit softening.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 12231876      PMCID: PMC158863          DOI: 10.1104/pp.102.3.911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  5 in total

1.  Informed consent.

Authors:  Otto F Peters
Journal:  Med Group Manage       Date:  1973 Jul-Aug

2.  Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA.

Authors:  P W Oeller; M W Lu; L P Taylor; D A Pike; A Theologis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Diverse mechanisms for the regulation of ethylene-inducible gene expression.

Authors:  J E Lincoln; R L Fischer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1988-04

4.  A bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase/promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes.

Authors:  S Tabor; C C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Control of ethylene synthesis by expression of a bacterial enzyme in transgenic tomato plants.

Authors:  H J Klee; M B Hayford; K A Kretzmer; G F Barry; G M Kishore
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.277

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Molecular and physiological evidence suggests the existence of a system II-like pathway of ethylene production in non-climacteric Citrus fruit.

Authors:  Ehud Katz; Paulino Martinez Lagunes; Joseph Riov; David Weiss; Eliezer E Goldschmidt
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Separation of cis elements responsive to ethylene, fruit development, and ripening in the 5'-flanking region of the ripening-related E8 gene.

Authors:  J Deikman; R Xu; M L Kneissl; J A Ciardi; K N Kim; D Pelah
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Antisense suppression of deoxyhypusine synthase in tomato delays fruit softening and alters growth and development.

Authors:  Tzann-Wei Wang; Chun-Guang Zhang; Wendy Wu; Linda M Nowack; Ewa Madey; John E Thompson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  The tomato ethylene receptors NR and LeETR4 are negative regulators of ethylene response and exhibit functional compensation within a multigene family.

Authors:  D M Tieman; M G Taylor; J A Ciardi; H J Klee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transcriptome and selected metabolite analyses reveal multiple points of ethylene control during tomato fruit development.

Authors:  Rob Alba; Paxton Payton; Zhanjun Fei; Ryan McQuinn; Paul Debbie; Gregory B Martin; Steven D Tanksley; James J Giovannoni
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Effect of down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis on fruit flavor complex in apple fruit.

Authors:  Abhaya M Dandekari; Gianni Teo; Bruno G Defilippi; Sandra L Uratsu; Andrew J Passey; Adel A Kader; John R Stow; Richard J Colgan; David J James
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  The Tomato E8 Gene Influences Ethylene Biosynthesis in Fruit but Not in Flowers.

Authors:  M. L. Kneissl; J. Deikman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Suppression of Ripening-Associated Gene Expression in Tomato Fruits Subjected to a High CO2 Concentration.

Authors:  C. Rothan; S. Duret; C. Chevalier; P. Raymond
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity.

Authors:  Montserrat Saladié; Antonio J Matas; Tal Isaacson; Matthew A Jenks; S Mark Goodwin; Karl J Niklas; Ren Xiaolin; John M Labavitch; Kenneth A Shackel; Alisdair R Fernie; Anna Lytovchenko; Malcolm A O'Neill; Chris B Watkins; Jocelyn K C Rose
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Genetic introgression of ethylene-suppressed transgenic tomatoes with higher-polyamines trait overcomes many unintended effects due to reduced ethylene on the primary metabolome.

Authors:  Anatoly P Sobolev; Anil Neelam; Tahira Fatima; Vijaya Shukla; Avtar K Handa; Autar K Mattoo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.