Literature DB >> 9700072

Separation of cis elements responsive to ethylene, fruit development, and ripening in the 5'-flanking region of the ripening-related E8 gene.

J Deikman1, R Xu, M L Kneissl, J A Ciardi, K N Kim, D Pelah.   

Abstract

The E8 gene is expressed at a high level during fruit ripening, and is transcriptionally activated by ethylene. We have identified a 428 bp fragment of the E8 5'-flanking region, from -1528 to -1100, that makes a minimal 35S promoter responsive to ethylene. This fragment confers ethylene-responsiveness only in the 5'-to-3' orientation; in the reverse orientation it results in increased expression in unripe fruit. Interestingly, this ethylene-responsive construct does not have high levels of expression during fruit ripening, indicating that sequences required for high level expression during fruit ripening are separate from sequences required for ethylene response. The ethylene-responsive sequences of the E8 5'-flanking region interact with the same DNA-binding protein that interacts with sequences required for ethylene responsiveness of the coordinately regulated E4 gene. We also conducted experiments to test the function of a second DNA-binding protein that interacts with both E4 and E8 5'-flanking sequences, the E4/E8-binding protein (E4/E8BP). We examined the effect of an internal deletion from -1088 to -863, which includes the binding site for E4/E8BP, on gene expression. This deletion did not affect expression in ripening fruit, and did not impair ethylene responsiveness. The deletion had a negative effect on expression in unripe fruit, but resulted in increased expression in leaves. These results suggest that the E4/E8BP is not critical for high levels of expression during fruit ripening or for ethylene response, but may play a role in organ-specific gene transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9700072     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006091928367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  25 in total

1.  Characterization of a DNA-binding protein that interacts with 5' flanking regions of two fruit-ripening genes.

Authors:  S A Coupe; J Deikman
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 2.  Molecular genetics of tomato fruit ripening.

Authors:  R G Fray; D Grierson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening.

Authors:  J J Giovannoni; D DellaPenna; A B Bennett; R L Fischer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Transcriptional Analysis of Polygalacturonase and Other Ripening Associated Genes in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruit.

Authors:  D Dellapenna; J E Lincoln; R L Fischer; A B Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Ethylene control of E4 transcription during tomato fruit ripening involves two cooperative cis elements.

Authors:  R Xu; S Goldman; S Coupe; J Deikman
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  The Tomato E8 Gene Influences Ethylene Biosynthesis in Fruit but Not in Flowers.

Authors:  M. L. Kneissl; J. Deikman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA.

Authors:  P W Oeller; M W Lu; L P Taylor; D A Pike; A Theologis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in tomato is encoded by a multigene family whose transcription is induced during fruit and floral senescence.

Authors:  W H Rottmann; G F Peter; P W Oeller; J A Keller; N F Shen; B P Nagy; L P Taylor; A D Campbell; A Theologis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Use of a tomato mutant constructed with reverse genetics to study fruit ripening, a complex developmental process.

Authors:  A Theologis; P W Oeller; L M Wong; W H Rottmann; D M Gantz
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1993

10.  Diverse mechanisms for the regulation of ethylene-inducible gene expression.

Authors:  J E Lincoln; R L Fischer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1988-04
View more
  23 in total

1.  A novel promoter from soybean that is active in a complex developmental pattern with and without its proximal 650 base pairs.

Authors:  M V Strömvik; V P Sundararaman; L O Vodkin
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Novel promoters that induce specific transgene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development.

Authors:  Kyoko Hiwasa-Tanase; Hirofumi Kuroda; Tadayoshi Hirai; Koh Aoki; Kenichi Takane; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Cholera toxin B protein in transgenic tomato fruit induces systemic immune response in mice.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Jiang; Zhu-Mei He; Zhi-Qiang Peng; Yu Qi; Qing Chen; Shou-Yi Yu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Molecular evolution of the E8 promoter in tomato and some of its relative wild species.

Authors:  Lingxia Zhao; Liya Lu; Lida Zhang; Aoxue Wang; Ning Wang; Zhuobin Liang; Xiaowen Lu; Kexuan Tang
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Transient expression of organophosphorus hydrolase to enhance the degrading activity of tomato fruit on coumaphos.

Authors:  Jie-hong Zhao; De-gang Zhao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  A sweetpotato SRD1 promoter confers strong root-, taproot-, and tuber-specific expression in Arabidopsis, carrot, and potato.

Authors:  Seol Ah Noh; Haeng-Soon Lee; Gyung Hye Huh; Mi-Joung Oh; Kyung-Hee Paek; Jeong Sheop Shin; Jung Myung Bae
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Uniform accumulation of recombinant miraculin protein in transgenic tomato fruit using a fruit-ripening-specific E8 promoter.

Authors:  Tadayoshi Hirai; You-Wang Kim; Kazuhisa Kato; Kyoko Hiwasa-Tanase; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Characterization of the 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene family and the regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis in avocado.

Authors:  J T Chernys; J A Zeevaart
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Molecular and biochemical characterization of VR-EILs encoding mung bean ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE proteins.

Authors:  Jae-Hoon Lee; Woo Taek Kim
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Assessment of the utility of the tomato fruit-specific E8 promoter for driving vaccine antigen expression.

Authors:  Zhu-Mei He; Xiao-Ling Jiang; Yu Qi; Di-Qing Luo
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.