Literature DB >> 12230421

Utility of captopril renal scans for detecting renal artery stenosis.

Stephen J Huot1, Joni H Hansson, Holly Dey, John Concato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Captopril renal scanning (CRS) is commonly recommended as a noninvasive method for detecting renal artery stenosis (RAS), based on performance characteristics determined in research settings. Scant data are available, however, regarding the utility of CRS in clinical practice.
METHODS: We evaluated the performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) of CRS in a consecutive series of 90 patients who underwent both CRS and renal arteriography within a 6-month period (January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1995) at a university hospital.
RESULTS: Among 86 eligible patients (and 169 kidneys), the prevalence of RAS was 43%. The sensitivity of CRS was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-83%); the specificity was 59% (95% CI, 49%-69%); the positive predictive value was 58% (95% CI, 47%-68%); and the negative predictive value was 75% (95% CI, 64%-84%). Also, there was evidence of spectrum bias, because the sensitivity and specificity (as well as the positive and negative predictive values) were different for groups with and without vascular disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of CRS were substantially worse in a clinical practice setting than previously reported in research settings, despite a similar prevalence of RAS. Captopril renal scanning should not be used as an initial screening test for diagnosing RAS, even among patients with high clinical likelihood of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12230421     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.17.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

1.  38-year old woman with hypertension, headaches, and abdominal bruit.

Authors:  Mira T Keddis; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Relationship of Albuminuria and Renal Artery Stent Outcomes: Results From the CORAL Randomized Clinical Trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes With Renal Artery Lesions).

Authors:  Timothy P Murphy; Christopher J Cooper; Karol M Pencina; Ralph D'Agostino; Joseph Massaro; Donald E Cutlip; Kenneth Jamerson; Alan H Matsumoto; William Henrich; Joseph I Shapiro; Katherine R Tuttle; David J Cohen; Michael Steffes; Qi Gao; D Christopher Metzger; William B Abernethy; Stephen C Textor; John Briguglio; Alan T Hirsch; Sheldon Tobe; Lance D Dworkin
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Evaluation and approach to treatment of renal artery stenosis in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Jose A Silva
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Radionuclides in nephrourology, Part 2: pitfalls and diagnostic applications.

Authors:  Andrew T Taylor
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Pierre-François Plouin; Liesbeth Bax
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Renal artery stenting for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis identified in patients with coronary artery disease: Does captopril renal scintigraphy predict outcomes?

Authors:  Spyros Stratigis; Kostas Stylianou; Periklis P Kyriazis; Eleftheria-Kleio Dermitzaki; Dimitra Lygerou; Paraskevi Syngelaki; Stavros Stratakis; Sophia Koukouraki; Fragiskos Parthenakis; Dimitrios Tsetis; Eugene Daphnis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Endovascular Management of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Post-Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions Era Winner or False Alarm?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Georgios Karaolanis; George Galyfos; Emmanuel Barbaressos; Viktoria Palla; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2017-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.