Literature DB >> 12229990

Adaptive decision making in a lymphocyte infusion trial.

Peter F Thall1, Lurdes Y T Inoue, Thomas G Martin.   

Abstract

We describe an adaptive Bayesian design for a clinical trial of an experimental treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies who initially received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant but subsequently suffered a disease recurrence. Treatment consists of up to two courses of targeted immunotherapy followed by allogeneic donor lymphocyte infusion. The immunotherapy is a necessary precursor to the lymphocyte infusion, but it may cause severe liver toxicity and is certain to cause a low white blood cell count and low platelets. The primary scientific goal is to determine the infusion time that has the highest probability of treatment success, defined as the event that the patient does not suffer severe toxicity and is alive with recovered white blood cell count 50 days from the start of therapy. The method is based on a parametric model accounting for toxicity, time to white blood cell recovery, and survival time. The design includes an algorithm for between-patient immunotherapy dose de-escalation based on the toxicity data and an adaptive randomization among five possible infusion times according to their most recent posterior success probabilities. A simulation study shows that the design reliably selects the best infusion time while randomizing greater proportions of patients to superior infusion times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12229990     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Response-adaptive randomization for clinical trials with adjustment for covariate imbalance.

Authors:  Jing Ning; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A response-adaptive design of initial therapy for emergency department patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Sijin Wen; Jing Ning; Sean Collins; Donald Berry
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  Practical Bayesian adaptive randomisation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; J Kyle Wathen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  A Bayesian response-adaptive covariate-balanced randomization design with application to a leukemia clinical trial.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Xuelin Huang; Suyu Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Clofarabine ± fludarabine with once daily i.v. busulfan as pretransplant conditioning therapy for advanced myeloid leukemia and MDS.

Authors:  Borje S Andersson; Benigno C Valdez; Marcos de Lima; Xuemei Wang; Peter F Thall; Laura L Worth; Uday Popat; Timothy Madden; Chitra Hosing; Amin Alousi; Gabriela Rondon; Partow Kebriaei; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roy B Jones; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  An adaptive design for identifying the dose with the best efficacy/tolerability profile with application to a crossover dose-finding study.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Ken Liu; Ellen Snyder; Duane Snavely
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Two-stage designs for Phase 2 dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Changfu Xiao; Yevgen Tymofyeyev
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A Phase I/II trial design when response is unobserved in subjects with dose-limiting toxicity.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Shan Kang; Jeremy Mg Taylor
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 9.  The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Alessandra Giovagnoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.