OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in veterans of the Gulf war with or without unexplained physical disability (a proxy measure of ill health) and in similarly disabled veterans who had not been deployed to the Gulf war (non-Gulf veterans). DESIGN: Two phase cohort study. SETTING: Current and ex-service UK military personnel. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1 consisted of three randomly selected samples of Gulf veterans, veterans of the 1992-7 Bosnia peacekeeping mission, and UK military personnel not deployed to the Gulf war (Era veterans) who had completed a postal health questionnaire. Phase 2 consisted of randomly selected subsamples from phase 1 of Gulf veterans who reported physical disability (n=111) or who did not report disability (n=98) and of Bosnia (n=54) and Era (n=79) veterans who reported physical disability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychiatric disorders assessed by the schedule for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry and classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. RESULTS: Only 24% (n=27) of the disabled Gulf veterans had a formal psychiatric disorder (depression, anxiety, or alcohol related disorder). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in non-disabled Gulf veterans was 12%. Disability and psychiatric disorders were weakly associated in the Gulf group when confounding was adjusted for (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 99% confidence interval 0.8 to 7.2, P=0.04). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was similar in disabled non-Gulf veterans and disabled Gulf veterans ( 19% v 24%; 1.3, 0.5 to 3.4). All groups had rates for post-traumatic stress disorder of between 1% and 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Most disabled Gulf veterans do not have a formal psychiatric disorder. Post-traumatic stress disorder is not higher in Gulf veterans than in other veterans. Psychiatric disorders do not fully explain self reported ill health in Gulf veterans; alternative explanations for persistent ill health in Gulf veterans are needed.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in veterans of the Gulf war with or without unexplained physical disability (a proxy measure of ill health) and in similarly disabled veterans who had not been deployed to the Gulf war (non-Gulf veterans). DESIGN: Two phase cohort study. SETTING: Current and ex-service UK military personnel. PARTICIPANTS: Phase 1 consisted of three randomly selected samples of Gulf veterans, veterans of the 1992-7 Bosnia peacekeeping mission, and UK military personnel not deployed to the Gulf war (Era veterans) who had completed a postal health questionnaire. Phase 2 consisted of randomly selected subsamples from phase 1 of Gulf veterans who reported physical disability (n=111) or who did not report disability (n=98) and of Bosnia (n=54) and Era (n=79) veterans who reported physical disability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Psychiatric disorders assessed by the schedule for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry and classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition. RESULTS: Only 24% (n=27) of the disabled Gulf veterans had a formal psychiatric disorder (depression, anxiety, or alcohol related disorder). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in non-disabled Gulf veterans was 12%. Disability and psychiatric disorders were weakly associated in the Gulf group when confounding was adjusted for (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 99% confidence interval 0.8 to 7.2, P=0.04). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was similar in disabled non-Gulf veterans and disabled Gulf veterans ( 19% v 24%; 1.3, 0.5 to 3.4). All groups had rates for post-traumatic stress disorder of between 1% and 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Most disabled Gulf veterans do not have a formal psychiatric disorder. Post-traumatic stress disorder is not higher in Gulf veterans than in other veterans. Psychiatric disorders do not fully explain self reported ill health in Gulf veterans; alternative explanations for persistent ill health in Gulf veterans are needed.
Authors: K Fukuda; R Nisenbaum; G Stewart; W W Thompson; L Robin; R M Washko; D L Noah; D H Barrett; B Randall; B L Herwaldt; A C Mawle; W C Reeves Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-09-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Wolfe; S P Proctor; D J Erickson; T Heeren; M J Friedman; M T Huang; P B Sutker; J J Vasterling; R F White Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1999 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: C Unwin; N Blatchley; W Coker; S Ferry; M Hotopf; L Hull; K Ismail; I Palmer; A David; S Wessely Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-01-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anna Skowera; Matthew Hotopf; Elzbieta Sawicka; Ruben Varela-Calvino; Catherine Unwin; Vasilis Nikolaou; Lisa Hull; Khalida Ismail; Anthony S David; Simon C Wessely; Mark Peakman Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Robert K Gifford; Robert J Ursano; John A Stuart; Charles C Engel Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2006-04-29 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Caroline P Carney; Tomoko R Sampson; Paul M Peloso; Robert F Woolson; Donald W Black; Bradley N Doebbeling Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Amy C Iversen; Lauren van Staden; Jamie Hacker Hughes; Tess Browne; Lisa Hull; John Hall; Neil Greenberg; Roberto J Rona; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely; Nicola T Fear Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 3.630