Literature DB >> 12225712

Feasibility and efficacy of balloon-based neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting in a single-center setting.

Michael Schlüter1, Thilo Tübler, Detlef G Mathey, Joachim Schofer.   

Abstract

We sought to prospectively assess the feasibility and in-hospital efficacy of the PercuSurge GuardWire temporary balloon-occlusive system for neuroprotection during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS).Carotid angioplasty and stenting harbors a risk of distal embolization. Cerebral protection devices are currently under clinical investigation.Ninety-six consecutive patients with carotid bifurcation disease underwent a total of 102 CAS procedures with the intention to use the GuardWire for neuroprotection. GuardWire deployment was achieved in 99 procedures performed in 93 patients (97%). Device failure (n = 3) and severe neurologic responses to balloon occlusion of the targeted carotid artery (n = 2) accounted for five additional procedures that were essentially concluded without neuroprotection, for a total of 94 procedures completed as intended in 88 patients (92% procedural feasibility rate). Carotid angioplasty and stenting was performed successfully in 94 patients (100 procedures). There were no in-hospital deaths; but three patients (3.1%) sustained strokes, and two patients experienced transient ischemic attacks, for a total periprocedural complication rate of 5.2%. One major stroke occurred with the GuardWire in place, whereas two minor strokes were observed in patients in whom the device could not be deployed. Thus, successful neuroprotected CAS without major neurologic events was achieved in 87 patients (91%). The GuardWire temporary balloon-occlusive system is feasible as an adjunct to CAS in the majority of patients. It is associated with a 3.1% rate of major periprocedural neurologic complications. Adverse neurologic reactions to balloon occlusion may prohibit effective use of the system in about 2% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12225712     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Francesco Liistro; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Monitoring of regional cerebral oxygenation by near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid arterial stenting: preliminary study.

Authors:  Nobutaka Horie; Naoki Kitagawa; Minoru Morikawa; Makio Kaminogo; Izumi Nagata
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Dilation of the Internal Carotid Artery at the Entrance to the Carotid Canal following Carotid Artery Stenting Predicts Postprocedural Hyperperfusion.

Authors:  Norihito Shimamura; Tomoshige Kikkawa; Mitsuaki Hatanaka; Masato Naraoka; Akira Munakata; Hiroki Ohkuma
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-10

4.  Simulation Study of Distal Balloon Protection Systems during Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  T Kuroiwa; N Sakai; M Sakaguchi; H Adachi; H Imamura; C Sakai; A Morizane; H Ishihara; T Yano; S Nakao; H Kikuchi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Covered stents may provide extra protection during carotid artery stenting in high risk patients with an excessive thrombus burden.

Authors:  Ersan Tatli; Ahmet Barutcu; Emine Gazi; Yasemin Gunduz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-31

6.  Utility of covered stents for extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Barbaros E Cil; Erhan Akpinar; Bora Peynircioglu; Saruhan Cekirge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.