Literature DB >> 12221516

The influence of fetoabdominal tissues on fetal ECGs and MCGs.

J G Stinstra1, M J Peters.   

Abstract

Both fetal electrocardiography and fetal magnetocardiography are influenced by the volume conduction within the abdomen of the pregnant woman. In this paper, various models are used to simulate this influence. Such models are helpful to determine where to attach electrodes at the maternal abdomen in case fetal ECGs are measured and where to position the magnetocardiograph in case fetal MCGs are measured. Another goal is to assess the influence of individual differences, such as the amount of amniotic fluid. Seven models based on MR-images have been created, four for the third trimester of gestation, with the fetus in left occiput position, and three for the second trimester. The models consist of four compartments; the fetus, the vernix caseosa, the amniotic fluid, and the remainder of the maternal abdomen. It turns out that individual differences have a large impact on the fetal MCG and that the best measurement positions are expected over the centre of the abdomen near the fetal heart. The fetal ECG is dependent on the vernix caseosa and when this layer is present, the fetal ECG is best measured by two electrodes, one over the fetal mouth and the other over the bottom of the fetus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12221516     DOI: 10.1076/apab.110.3.165.8293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 1381-3455            Impact factor:   4.076


  11 in total

1.  Vector projection of biomagnetic fields.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; A Myers; W O Richards; W Drake; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Modelling passive cardiac conductivity during ischaemia.

Authors:  J G Stinstra; S Shome; B Hopenfeld; R S MacLeod
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Genetic algorithms for dipole location of fetal magnetocardiography.

Authors:  D Escalona-Vargas; P Murphy; C L Lowery; H Eswaran
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

4.  Magnetocardiography-guided management of an unusual case of isoimmune complete atrioventricular block complicated by ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Bibhuti Das; Bettina F Cuneo; Mark Ovadia; Janette F Strasburger; Christopher Johnsrude; Ronald T Wakai
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  The effect of volume conductor modeling on the estimation of cardiac vectors in fetal magnetocardiography.

Authors:  Rong Tao; Elena-Anda Popescu; William B Drake; David N Jackson; Mihai Popescu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Coupling Analysis of Fetal and Maternal Heart Rates via Transfer Entropy Using Magnetocardiography.

Authors:  R Avci; D Escalona-Vargas; E R Siegel; C L Lowery; H Eswaran
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

7.  Tracking Fetal Movement Through Source Localization From Multisensor Magnetocardiographic Recordings.

Authors:  Recep Avci; James D Wilson; Diana Escalona-Vargas; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.772

8.  Cardiac vectors in the healthy human fetus: developmental changes assessed by magnetocardiography and realistic approximations of the volume conductor.

Authors:  R Tao; E A Popescu; W B Drake; M Popescu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.833

9.  Comparison of diurnal variations, gestational age and gender related differences in fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters between appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in the home environment.

Authors:  Habiba Kapaya; Richard Jacques; Dilly Anumba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Developmental milestones of the autonomic nervous system revealed via longitudinal monitoring of fetal heart rate variability.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Franziska Bode; Alexander Schmidt; Samuel Nowack; Anja Rudolph; Eva-Maria Dölker; Peter Schlattmann; Theresa Götz; Dirk Hoyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.