Literature DB >> 12218632

Facial nerve grading systems (1985-2002): beyond the House-Brackmann scale.

Thomas S Kang1, Jeffrey T Vrabec, Neil Giddings, David J Terris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess methods of evaluating the function of the facial nerve that have been introduced over the past 15 years, particularly in comparison with the House-Brackmann scale. DATA SOURCES A Medline search was undertaken of the English-language medical literature between 1983 and 2000 to identify proposed methods of evaluating facial nerve function. STUDY SELECTION Although all grading systems were considered, attention was focused on the systems that provided improvements in either precision or ease of use. CONCLUSIONS Because of the limitations and subjectivity of the House-Brackmann scale, several new scales of various degrees of objectivity and ease of use have been introduced. The Nottingham system offers a more objective but easy-to-use facial nerve grading system that has been demonstrated to be valid and that would be easy for the average practitioner to adopt. The authors propose a more systematic evaluation of this system to determine whether its widespread application is appropriate.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218632     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  [Diagnostics of diseases and the function of the facial nerve].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius; C Sittel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Neuro-ophthalmologic complications and manifestations of upper and lower motor neuron facial paresis.

Authors:  M Tariq Bhatti; Jade S Schiffman; Anastas F Pass; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  A neurological disease on the face of an ancient Roman sculpture.

Authors:  G Baggieri; L Galieti
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 May-Jun

4.  Characteristics of the perception for unilateral facial nerve palsy.

Authors:  Sue Jean Mun; Kyung Tae Park; Yoonjoong Kim; Joo Hyun Park; Young Ho Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  [Simulation and aggravation in ENT medical examinations. A prospective study].

Authors:  M Streppel; T Brusis
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Validation of the Turkish Version of the Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0.

Authors:  Erdem Mengi; Cüneyt Orhan Kara; Fazıl Necdet Ardıç; Fevzi Barlay; Taylan Çil; Kübra Aktan; Hande Şenol
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-01

7.  Hearing and facial function outcomes for neurofibromatosis 2 clinical trials.

Authors:  Scott R Plotkin; Simone L Ardern-Holmes; Fred G Barker; Jaishri O Blakeley; D Gareth Evans; Rosalie E Ferner; Tessa A Hadlock; Chris Halpin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Measurement of facial movements with Photoshop software during treatment of facial nerve palsy.

Authors:  Abbas Ali Pourmomeny; Hassan Zadmehr; Mohsen Hossaini
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  A new 3-dimensional dynamic quantitative analysis system of facial motion: an establishment and reliability test.

Authors:  Guodong Feng; Yang Zhao; Xu Tian; Zhiqiang Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quality of life assessment in facial palsy: validation of the Dutch Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale.

Authors:  Ingrid J Kleiss; Carien H G Beurskens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Koen J A O Ingels; Henri A M Marres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.