Literature DB >> 12214186

Can patient reactions to the first chiropractic treatment predict early favorable treatment outcome in persistent low back pain?

Iben Axén, Annika Rosenbaum, Robert Röbech, Thomas Wren, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether 3 distinct patterns of reactions to chiropractic care predict early favorable treatment outcome in patients with persistent low back pain. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Multicenter, clinic-based prospective outcome study with standardized interview questionnaires conducted in private chiropractic practices in Sweden. STUDY
SUBJECTS: Previously compliant chiropractors were invited to participate in the study. A maximum of 20 consecutive patients (per chiropractor) who sought chiropractic care for low back pain with or without sciatica with a duration of more than 2 weeks at the time of consultation and for a minimum of 30 days total during the past year. INTERVENTION: Chiropractic management as decided by the treating chiropractor. OUTCOME AND PREDICTOR VARIABLES: Improvement was defined at the 4th visit as self-reported "definitely improved" (the best of 5 choices). The hypothesized most favorable prognostic group had immediate improvement reported on the 1st visit, reduced pain intensity reported on the 2nd visit, reduced disability reported on the 2nd visit, and a common reaction or no reaction reported on the 2nd visit. The hypothesized least favorable prognostic group had no immediate improvement on the 1st visit, no reduction of pain intensity on the 2nd visit, no reduced disability on the 2nd visit, and no reaction or an uncommon reaction reported on the 2nd visit. The hypothesized intermediate prognostic group included all patients who did not fit into the hypothesized most favorable or least favorable groups. COVARIABLES: Age, sex, pain intensity during past 24 hours, description of disability, duration and pattern of pain during present attack, duration and pattern of pain during past 12 months. ANALYSIS OF DATA: The 3 predictor-groups were cross-tabulated against the outcome variable and the other covariates.
RESULTS: Of the 115 patients in the most favorable prognostic group, 84% (95% confidence interval, 77-91) reported to be "definitely improved" by the 4th visit versus 63% (59-67) of the 384 patients in the intermediate prognostic group, and 30% (22-38) of the 116 patients in the least favorable prognostic group. No major interactions from the covariates could explain these results.
CONCLUSION: Among chiropractic patients with persistent low back pain, it is possible to predict which patients will report definite improvement early in the course of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12214186     DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2002.126473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  16 in total

1.  Knowledge Transfer within the Canadian Chiropractic Community. Part 1: Understanding Evidence-Practice Gaps.

Authors:  Greg Kawchuk; Paul Bruno; Jason W Busse; André Bussières; Mark Erwin; Steven Passmore; John Srbely
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-06

2.  Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Michael D Ross; John M Tonarelli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  A functional pre-manipulative spinal orthopedic assessment maneuver.

Authors:  David E Stude
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

4.  Analyzing repeated data collected by mobile phones and frequent text messages. An example of low back pain measured weekly for 18 weeks.

Authors:  Iben Axén; Lennart Bodin; Alice Kongsted; Niels Wedderkopp; Irene Jensen; Gunnar Bergström
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  The Nordic Subpopulation Research Programme: prediction of treatment outcome in patients with low back pain treated by chiropractors--does the psychological profile matter?

Authors:  Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Annika Rosenbaum; Iben Axén; Peter W Lövgren; Kristian Jørgensen; Laszlo Halasz; Andreas Eklund; Niels Wedderkopp
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2009-12-30

6.  Gender differences in pain levels before and after treatment: a prospective outcomes study on 3,900 Swiss patients with musculoskeletal complaints.

Authors:  Cynthia K Peterson; B Kim Humphreys; Jürg Hodler; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Predictors of outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic care: comparison of acute and chronic patients.

Authors:  Cynthia Peterson; Jennifer Bolton; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-08-24

8.  Conducting practice-based projects among chiropractors: a manual.

Authors:  Iben Axén; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2013-02-01

9.  The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: predicting outcome among chiropractic patients in Finland.

Authors:  Stefan Malmqvist; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Tuomo Ahola; Olli Andersson; Kristian Ekström; Harri Pekkarinen; Markku Turpeinen; Niels Wedderkopp
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-11-07

10.  Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care - study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andreas Eklund; Iben Axén; Alice Kongsted; Malin Lohela-Karlsson; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Irene Jensen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.