Literature DB >> 19674648

A functional pre-manipulative spinal orthopedic assessment maneuver.

David E Stude1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce and describe a standardized protocol for a functional, pre-manipulative assessment procedure for spinal pain.
DESIGN: Two brief case reports and the clinical utility of this maneuver is compared with another commonly used orthopedic test in a retrospective study involving 50 subjects.
SETTING: Northwestern Health Sciences University's Bloomington Natural Care Center.
RESULTS: The use of the proposed pre-manipulative orthopedic assessment maneuver may have clinical utility for patients presenting with back and/or leg pain. There were differences in the subjective responses of some subjects between the use of the torsion test and the straight leg raise and some results that suggest a correlation between the two tests.
CONCLUSION: The test described may be useful as an additional assessment procedure since it closely reflects those spinal stressors that are commonly present when manual therapy is being employed. Additionally, the torsion test may have practical utility since it can be modified to reflect different techniques employed by different health care providers.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 19674648      PMCID: PMC2647035          DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60115-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  35 in total

1.  An evaluation of the experimental and investigational status and clinical validity of manipulation of patients under anesthesia: a contemporary opinion.

Authors:  R C Gordon
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The physics of spinal manipulation. Part IV. A theoretical consideration of the physician impact force and energy requirements needed to produce synovial joint cavitation.

Authors:  M Haas
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 3.  Studies on the biomechanical effect of a spinal adjustment.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Reliability of motion palpation procedures to detect sacroiliac joint fixations.

Authors:  W Herzog; L J Read; P J Conway; L D Shaw; M C McEwen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Effective management of spinal pain in one hundred seventy-seven patients evaluated for manipulation under anesthesia.

Authors:  D T West; R S Mathews; M R Miller; G M Kent
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold.

Authors:  Andrew A Fischer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration.

Authors:  H F Farfan; J W Cossette; G H Robertson; R V Wells; H Kraus
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Manipulation of the lumbar spine with the patient under general anesthesia: evaluation by electromyography and clinical-neurologic examination of its use for lumbar nerve root compression syndrome.

Authors:  D Siehl; D R Olson; H E Ross; E E Rockwood
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  1971-01

9.  Changes in innominate tilt after manipulation of the sacroiliac joint in patients with low back pain. An experimental study.

Authors:  M T Cibulka; A Delitto; R M Koldehoff
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-09

Review 10.  The prediction of forces in joint structures; distribution of intersegmental resultants.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 6.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.