Literature DB >> 12212853

Comparative studies of frameshifting and nonframeshifting RNA pseudoknots: a mutational and NMR investigation of pseudoknots derived from the bacteriophage T2 gene 32 mRNA and the retroviral gag-pro frameshift site.

Yue Wang1, Norma M Wills, Zhihua Du, Anupama Rangan, John F Atkins, Raymond F Gesteland, David W Hoffman.   

Abstract

Mutational and NMR methods were used to investigate features of sequence, structure, and dynamics that are associated with the ability of a pseudoknot to stimulate a -1 frameshift. In vitro frameshift assays were performed on retroviral gag-pro frameshift-stimulating pseudoknots and their derivatives, a pseudoknot from the gene 32 mRNA of bacteriophage T2 that is not naturally associated with frameshifting, and hybrids of these pseudoknots. Results show that the gag-pro pseudoknot from human endogenous retrovirus-K10 (HERV) stimulates a -1 frameshift with an efficiency similar to that of the closely related retrovirus MMTV. The bacteriophage T2 mRNA pseudoknot was found to be a poor stimulator of frameshifting, supporting a hypothesis that the retroviral pseudoknots have distinctive properties that make them efficient frameshift stimulators. A hybrid, designed by combining features of the bacteriophage and retroviral pseudoknots, was found to stimulate frameshifting while retaining significant structural similarity to the nonframeshifting bacteriophage pseudoknot. Mutational analyses of the retroviral and hybrid pseudoknots were used to evaluate the effects of an unpaired (wedged) adenosine at the junction of the pseudoknot stems, changing the base pairs near the junction of the two stems, and changing the identity of the loop 2 nucleotide nearest the junction of the stems. Pseudoknots both with and without the wedged adenosine can stimulate frameshifting, though the identities of the nucleotides near the stem1/stem2 junction do influence efficiency. NMR data showed that the bacteriophage and hybrid pseudoknots are similar in their local structure at the junction of the stems, indicating that pseudoknots that are similar in this structural feature can differ radically in their ability to stimulate frameshifting. NMR methods were used to compare the internal motions of the bacteriophage T2 pseudoknot and representative frameshifting pseudoknots. The stems of the investigated pseudoknots are similarly well ordered on the time scales to which nitrogen-15 relaxation data are sensitive; however, solvent exchange rates for protons at the junction of the two stems of the nonframeshifting bacteriophage pseudoknot are significantly slower than the analogous protons in the representative frameshifting pseudoknots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12212853      PMCID: PMC1370320          DOI: 10.1017/s1355838202024044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  47 in total

1.  Anisotropic molecular rotational diffusion in 15N spin relaxation studies of protein mobility.

Authors:  P Luginbühl; K V Pervushin; H Iwai; K Wüthrich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-06-17       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A characteristic bent conformation of RNA pseudoknots promotes -1 frameshifting during translation of retroviral RNA.

Authors:  X Chen; H Kang; L X Shen; M Chamorro; H E Varmus; I Tinoco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Structure of the autoregulatory pseudoknot within the gene 32 messenger RNA of bacteriophages T2 and T6: a model for a possible family of structurally related RNA pseudoknots.

Authors:  Z Du; D P Giedroc; D W Hoffman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  The stability and dynamics of ribosomal protein L9: investigations of a molecular strut by amide proton exchange and circular dichroism.

Authors:  J Lillemoen; C S Cameron; D W Hoffman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Proton exchange and basepair kinetics of yeast tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Asp1).

Authors:  B S Choi; A G Redfield
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Studies of base pair kinetics by NMR measurement of proton exchange.

Authors:  M Guéron; J L Leroy
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Conformation of a non-frameshifting RNA pseudoknot from mouse mammary tumor virus.

Authors:  H Kang; J V Hines; I Tinoco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Characterization of the human endogenous retrovirus K proteinase.

Authors:  S Schommer; M Sauter; H G Kräusslich; B Best; N Mueller-Lantzsch
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.891

9.  The structure of an RNA pseudoknot that causes efficient frameshifting in mouse mammary tumor virus.

Authors:  L X Shen; I Tinoco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-14       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Analysis of the role of the pseudoknot component in the SRV-1 gag-pro ribosomal frameshift signal: loop lengths and stability of the stem regions.

Authors:  E B ten Dam; P W Verlaan; C W Pleij
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The 9-A solution: how mRNA pseudoknots promote efficient programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting.

Authors:  Ewan P Plant; Kristi L Muldoon Jacobs; Jason W Harger; Arturas Meskauskas; Jonathan L Jacobs; Jennifer L Baxter; Alexey N Petrov; Jonathan D Dinman
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Programmed -1 frameshifting efficiency correlates with RNA pseudoknot conformational plasticity, not resistance to mechanical unfolding.

Authors:  Dustin B Ritchie; Daniel A N Foster; Michael T Woodside
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: From genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use.

Authors:  John F Atkins; Gary Loughran; Pramod R Bhatt; Andrew E Firth; Pavel V Baranov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Complex dynamics under tension in a high-efficiency frameshift stimulatory structure.

Authors:  Matthew T J Halma; Dustin B Ritchie; Tonia R Cappellano; Krishna Neupane; Michael T Woodside
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A loop 2 cytidine-stem 1 minor groove interaction as a positive determinant for pseudoknot-stimulated -1 ribosomal frameshifting.

Authors:  Peter V Cornish; Mirko Hennig; David P Giedroc
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The global structures of a wild-type and poorly functional plant luteoviral mRNA pseudoknot are essentially identical.

Authors:  Peter V Cornish; Suzanne N Stammler; David P Giedroc
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Characterization of RNA elements that regulate gag-pol ribosomal frameshifting in equine infectious anemia virus.

Authors:  Chaoping Chen; Ronald C Montelaro
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Efficient stimulation of site-specific ribosome frameshifting by antisense oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Michael T Howard; Raymond F Gesteland; John F Atkins
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Secondary structures for 5' regions of R2 retrotransposon RNAs reveal a novel conserved pseudoknot and regions that evolve under different constraints.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kierzek; Shawn M Christensen; Thomas H Eickbush; Ryszard Kierzek; Douglas H Turner; Walter N Moss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The stimulatory RNA of the Visna-Maedi retrovirus ribosomal frameshifting signal is an unusual pseudoknot with an interstem element.

Authors:  Simon Pennell; Emily Manktelow; Andrew Flatt; Geoff Kelly; Stephen J Smerdon; Ian Brierley
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.