Literature DB >> 12211695

Nineteenth century mercury: hazard to wading birds and cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada.

Charles J Henny1, Elwood F Hill, David J Hoffman, Marilyn G Spalding, Robert A Grove.   

Abstract

Contemporary mercury interest relates to atmospheric deposition, contaminated fish stocks and exposed fish-eating wildlife. The focus is on methylmercury (MeHg) even though most contamination is of inorganic (IoHg) origin. However, IoHg is readily methylated in aquatic systems to become more hazardous to vertebrates. In response to a classic episode of historical (1859-1890) IoHg contamination, we studied fish-eating birds nesting along the lower Carson River, Nevada. Adult double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), snowy egrets (Egretta thula) and black-crowned night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) contained very high concentrations of total mercury (THg) in their livers (geo. means 134.8 microg/g wet weight (ww), 43.7 and 13.5, respectively) and kidneys (69.4, 11.1 and 6.1, respectively). Apparently tolerance of these concentrations was possible due to a threshold-dependent demethylation coupled with sequestration of resultant IoHg. Demethylation and sequestration processes also appeared to have reduced the amount of MeHg redistributed to eggs. However, the relatively short time spent by adults in the contaminated area before egg laying was also a factor in lower than expected concentrations of mercury in eggs. Most eggs (100% MeHg) had concentrations below 0.80 microg/g ww, the putative threshold concentration where reproductive problems may be expected; there was no conclusive evidence of mercury-related depressed hatchability. After hatching, the young birds were fed diets by their parents averaging 0.36-1.18 microgMeHg/g ww through fledging. During this four to six week period, accumulated mercury concentrations in the organs of the fledglings were much lower than found in adults, but evidence was detected of toxicity to their immune (spleen, thymus, bursa), detoxicating (liver, kidneys) and nervous systems. Several indications of oxidative stress were also noted in the fledglings and were most apparent in young cormorants containing highest concentrations of mercury. This stress was evidenced by increased thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, low activities of enzymes related to glutathione metabolism and low levels of reduced thiols, plus an increase in the ratio of oxidized to reduced glutathione. At lower concentrations of mercury, as was found in young egrets, we observed elevated activities of protective hepatic enzymes, which could help reduce oxidative stress. Immune deficiencies and neurological impairment of fledglings may affect survivability when confronted with the stresses of learning to forage and the ability to complete their first migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211695     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016327602656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  15 in total

1.  Mercury pollution in Brazil.

Authors:  J O Nriagu; W C Pfeiffer; O Malm; C M Magalhaes de Souza; G Mierle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mercury and selenium contents of seals from fresh and brackish waters in Finland.

Authors:  T Kari; P Kauranen
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Methylmercury accumulation in tissues and its effects on growth and appetite in captive great egrets.

Authors:  M G Spalding; P C Frederick; H C McGill; S N Bouton; L R McDowell
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.535

4.  Role of sulfhydryls in the hepatotoxicity of organic and metallic compounds.

Authors:  C D Klaassen; W M Bracken; R E Dudley; P L Goering; G A Hazelton; J J Hjelle
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1985-10

5.  Enhanced and inhibited biotransformation of methyl mercury in the rat spleen.

Authors:  I Suda; H Takahashi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  The chemical form of mercury stored in South Atlantic seabirds.

Authors:  D R Thompson; R W Furness
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 7.  Mercury and selenium interaction: a review.

Authors:  M L Cuvin-Aralar; R W Furness
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 8.  Glutathione mercaptides as transport forms of metals.

Authors:  N Ballatori
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  1994

9.  Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental north america.

Authors:  E B Swain; D R Engstrom; M E Brigham; T A Henning; P L Brezonik
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models.

Authors:  D Rice; S Barone
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  33 in total

1.  Oxidative stress in songbirds exposed to dietary methylmercury.

Authors:  Katie A Henry; Daniel A Cristol; Claire W Varian-Ramos; Eric L Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury levels in birds and small rodents from Las Orquideas National Natural Park, Colombia.

Authors:  Lucellys Sierra-Marquez; Sandra Peñuela-Gomez; Laura Franco-Espinosa; Daisy Gomez-Ruiz; Juan Diaz-Nieto; Juan Sierra-Marquez; Jesus Olivero-Verbel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biomagnification of mercury in trophic relation of Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and fish in the Vistula Lagoon, Poland.

Authors:  Małgorzata Misztal-Szkudlińska; Piotr Szefer; Piotr Konieczka; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Trace element concentrations and bioindicator responses in tree swallows from northwestern Minnesota.

Authors:  Christine M Custer; Thomas W Custer; David Warburton; David J Hoffman; John W Bickham; Cole W Matson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Retrospective biomonitoring of mercury and other elements in museum feathers of common kestrel Falco tinnunculus using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA).

Authors:  Paola Movalli; Peter Bode; René Dekker; Lorenzo Fornasari; Steven van der Mije; Reuven Yosef
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Relationships between blood mercury levels, reproduction, and return rate in a small seabird.

Authors:  Ingrid L Pollet; Marty L Leonard; Nelson J O'Driscoll; Neil M Burgess; Dave Shutler
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Mercury and drought along the lower Carson River, Nevada: II. Snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron reproduction on Lahontan Reservoir, 1997--2006.

Authors:  Elwood F Hill; Charles J Henny; Robert A Grove
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Integrated mercury monitoring program for temperate estuarine and marine ecosystems on the North American Atlantic coast.

Authors:  David C Evers; Robert P Mason; Neil C Kamman; Celia Y Chen; Andrea L Bogomolni; David L Taylor; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Stephen H Jones; Neil M Burgess; Kenneth Munney; Katharine C Parsons
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  Survival of postfledging Forster's terns in relation to mercury exposure in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; John Y Takekawa; Samuel A Iverson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Marine foraging birds as bioindicators of mercury in the Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  M Wing Goodale; David C Evers; Steven E Mierzykowski; Alexander L Bond; Neil M Burgess; Catherine I Otorowski; Linda J Welch; C Scott Hall; Julie C Ellis; R Bradford Allen; Anthony W Diamond; Stephen W Kress; Robert J Taylor
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.