Literature DB >> 12209904

Biological reactivity of zirconia-hydroxyapatite composites.

Viviane V Silva1, Fernando S Lameiras, Zélia I P Lobato.   

Abstract

Materials and devices intended for end-use applications as implants and medical devices must be evaluated to determine their biocompatibility potential in contact with physiological systems. The use of standard practices of biological testing provides a reasonable level of confidence concerning the response of a living organism to a given material or device, as well as guidance in selecting the proper procedures to be carried out for the screening of new or modified materials. This article presents results from cytotoxicity assays of cell culture, skin irritation, and acute toxicity by systemic and intracutaneous injections for powders, ceramic bodies, and extract liquids of hydroxyapatite (HA), calcia partially stabilized zirconia (ZO), and two types of zirconia-hydroxyapatite composites (Z4H6 and Z6H4) with potential for future use as orthopedic and dental implants. They indicate that these materials present potential for this type of application because they meet the requirements of the standard practices recommended for evaluating the biological reactivity of ATCC cell cultures (CCL1 NCTC clone 929 of mouse connective tissue and CCL 81 of monkey connective tissue) and animals (rabbit and mouse) with direct or indirect patient contact, or by the injection of specific extracts prepared from the material under test. In addition, studies involving short-term intramuscular and long-term implantation assays to estimate the reaction of living tissue to the composites studied, and investigations on long-term effects that these materials can cause on the cellular metabolism, are already in progress. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 63: 583-590, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209904     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  5 in total

Review 1.  An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Beata Lecka-Czernik; Nabil A Ebraheim; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Zirconium oxide regulates RNA interfering of osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Giorgio Brunelli; Ilaria Zollino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Marcella Martinelli; Luca Scapoli; Marzia Arlotti; Elena Masiero; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Biological evaluation of the copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite intrauterine device.

Authors:  Li-Xia Hu; Jing He; Li Hou; Hong Wang; Jun Li; Changsheng Xie; Zhuo Duan; Li-Kui Sun; Xin Wang; Changhong Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Prosthetic Workflow in the Digital Era.

Authors:  Lidia Tordiglione; Michele De Franco; Giovanni Bosetti
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Sintering Pmperature-Dependence on Radiopacity of Bi(2-x) ZrxO(3+x/2) Powders Prepared by Sol-Gel Process.

Authors:  May-Show Chen; Shih-Hsun Chen; Fu-Chih Lai; Chin-Yi Chen; Ming-Yuan Hsieh; Wei-Jen Chang; Jen-Chang Yang; Chung-Kwei Lin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.