Literature DB >> 12209246

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by salvage surgery: effect on survival of patients with primary noncurative gastric cancer.

Masahiko Yano1, Hitoshi Shiozaki, Masatoshi Inoue, Shigeyuki Tamura, Yuichiro Doki, Takushi Yasuda, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, Morito Monden.   

Abstract

The prognosis for gastric cancer patients who undergo noncurative resection is extremely poor. This study evaluated the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary noncurative gastric cancer. Thirty-four patients with biopsy-proven noncurative gastric cancer were treated with either of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies: FEMTXP (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin) or THP-FLPM (pirarubicin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, cisplatin, mitomycin C). Noncurability was determined by conventional staging procedures, staging laparoscopy, and exploratory laparotomy. After chemotherapy the resectability of the tumors was reassessed. Patients who were judged to be candidates for curative resection underwent salvage surgery. Of the final 33 patients, 8 (24.2%) showed a major response [0 complete response (CR), 8 partial response (PR)]. In three patients the second laparoscopy revealed disappearance of the peritoneal metastasis. Of the 33 patients, 14 (42.4%) underwent salvage surgery, including 8 curative resections (2 curability A, 6 curability B). Pathologic examinations revealed a grade 2 response in eight patients but no grade 3 response. Univariate analysis showed the following to be significant prognostic factors: histology type (differentiated type vs. undifferentiated type; p = 0.035), T4 as a noncurative factor (T4 vs. T3 or less; p = 0.025), clinical response (PR + no change vs. progressive disease; p = 0.002), and salvage surgery (resected vs. unresected; p = 0.001). Among these factors, salvage surgery was found to be the only independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis, with a relative risk of 0.253 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.066 to 0.974. The treatment was well tolerated. Major toxicities of WHO grade 3 or more were leukopenia in 20 (60.6%), gastrointestinal toxicities in 5 (15.2%), renal toxicities in 2 (6.1%), and alopecia in 1 (3.0%). In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is effective for primary noncurative gastric cancer when salvage surgery can be performed. A chemotherapy regimen with a higher complete response rate would improve the prognosis of this dismal disease even more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209246     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6362-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus associated with Barrett's epithelium: report of a case.

Authors:  Kiichi Maezato; Tadashi Nishimaki; Mariko Oshiro; Toshimitu Yamashiro; Hideaki Sasaki; Yasunori Sashida
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Conversion surgery after combination chemotherapy of docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 (DCS) for far-advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Mieno; Keishi Yamashita; Kei Hosoda; Hiromitsu Moriya; Katsuhiko Higuchi; Mizutomo Azuma; Shouko Komori; Tsutomu Yoshida; Satoshi Tanabe; Wasaburo Koizumi; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and CDDP in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mitsugu Kochi; Masashi Fujii; Noriaki Kanamori; Teruo Kaiga; Toru Takahashi; Michiyo Kobayashi; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Conversion therapy for gastric cancer: who can make conversion as successful as Goromaru?

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a comparison of the directionality of lymph node metastasis and the total number of metastatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Maki Kitagawa; Daisuke Ichikawa; Shuhei Komatsu; Kazuma Okamoto; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Yasutoshi Murayama; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hisashi Ikoma; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Toshiya Ochiai; Yukihito Kokuba; Teruhisa Sonoyama; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Retrospective analysis of 45 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy using an S-1/CDDP combination.

Authors:  Seiji Satoh; Suguru Hasegawa; Nobuhiro Ozaki; Hiroshi Okabe; Go Watanabe; Satoshi Nagayama; Masanori Fukushima; Arimichi Takabayashi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Evaluation of salvage surgery for type 4 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshio Hashimoto; Osamu Usuba; Mitsuru Toyono; Ikuko Nasu; Miwako Takeda; Miho Suzuki; Toshiko Endou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-27

8.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients who underwent noncurative gastrectomy with long-term survival.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Yoshinori Yamada; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Aggressive locoregional surgical therapy for gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; Mazen Zenati; Arun Mavanur; Joshua Winer; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Kenneth Lee; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Prognostic factors of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer: A retrospective study from a single center.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Men; Hong-Feng Gou; Ji-Yan Liu; Qiu Li; DE-Yun Luo; Feng Bi; Meng Qiu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.