Literature DB >> 12208910

High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. Knee function after longer follow-up.

Dennis P Weigel1, J Lawrence Marsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of the long-term outcomes of treatment of fractures of the tibial plateau have included wide mixtures of fracture types and mostly low-energy split and split-depression fractures. The long-term results of treatment of high-energy intra-articular proximal tibial fractures are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the function of the knee and the development of arthrosis at a minimum of five years after injury in a consecutive series of patients in whom a high-energy fracture of the tibial plateau had been treated with a uniform technique of external fixation.
METHODS: Between July 1988 and December 1994, thirty patients with a total of thirty-one fractures of the tibial plateau were treated with a monolateral external fixator and limited internal fixation of the articular surface. Follow-up data on twenty-four knees in twenty-three patients were obtained at a mean of ninety-eight months. Twenty patients (twenty knees) returned specifically for the study, at which time they completed an Iowa Knee Score questionnaire and a Short Form-36 (SF-36) general health survey, a physical examination was performed, and weight-bearing radiographs were made. The results of the SF-36 evaluations for fourteen patients and the Knee Scores for twelve were compared with those obtained five years previously, at two to four years after the injury.
RESULTS: After healing, no patient required a secondary reconstructive procedure. The range of motion of the knee averaged 3 degrees of extension to 120 degrees flexion, which was an average of 87% of the total arc of the contralateral knee. The average Iowa Knee Score was 90 points (range, 72 to 100 points). For twelve patients, the Iowa Knee Score previously recorded at two to four years averaged 92 points, as did the score at the time of the latest follow-up. Thirteen patients rated their outcome as excellent; six, as good; and three, as fair. Fifteen patients were working, and ten of them were performing strenuous labor. Radiographs showed no evidence of arthrosis in fourteen knees, grade-1 arthrosis in three, grade-2 in three, and grade-3 in two. Compared with the radiographic appearance two to four years after injury, there was no evidence of progression of arthrosis in eighteen knees and one grade of progression in four. The SF-36 subscale scores were similar to those of age-matched controls. The fourteen patients who had previous SF-36 scores had no deterioration of these scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high-energy fracture of the tibial plateau treated with external fixation have a good prognosis for satisfactory knee function in the second five years after injury. The knee joint cartilage appears to be tolerant of both the injury and mild-to-moderate residual articular displacement, which was associated with a low rate of severe arthrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208910     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  39 in total

1.  High energy tibial plateau fractures treated with hybrid external fixation.

Authors:  George C Babis; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Panagiotis Kontovazenitis; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; Panagiotis N Soucacos
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Fixation augmentation using calcium-phosphate bone substitute improves outcomes of complex tibial plateau fractures. A matched, cohort study.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Yassine Bulaïd; Christophe Jacquet; Sebastien Pesenti; Jean-Noel Argenson; Sebastien Parratte
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A revised 3-column classification approach for the surgical planning of extended lateral tibial plateau fractures.

Authors:  H Hoekstra; K Kempenaers; S Nijs
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Endstage arthritis following tibia plateau fractures: average 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ramin Mehin; Peter O'Brien; Henry Broekhuyse; Piotr Blachut; Pierre Guy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Tibial Plateau Fractures: A New Rank Ordering Method For Determining To What Degree Injury Severity Or Quality Of Reduction Correlate With Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Katie Freeman; Jared L Michalson; Donald D Anderson; Thomas D Brown; Thomas A DeCoster; Douglas R Dirschl; Matthew D Karam; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

6.  The degree of articular depression as a predictor of soft-tissue injuries in tibial plateau fracture.

Authors:  Alexander S Spiro; Marc Regier; Alexander Novo de Oliveira; Eik Vettorazzi; Michael Hoffmann; Jan Philipp Petersen; Frank Oliver Henes; Thomas Demuth; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures.

Authors:  Matthew Colman; Adam Wright; Gary Gruen; Peter Siska; Hans-Christoph Pape; Ivan Tarkin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 8.  [Posttraumatic deformities of the knee joint : Intra-articular osteotomy after malreduction of tibial head fractures].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; M Krause; J Frings; T Drenck; R Akoto; G Müller; J Madert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Intracondylar segment osteotomy: correction of intra-articular malalignment after fracture of the tibial plateau].

Authors:  C Krettek; N Hawi; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Utilization of the less-invasive stabilization system internal fixator for open fractures of the proximal tibia: a multi-center evaluation.

Authors:  James P Stannard; Christopher G Finkemeier; Jackson Lee; Philip J Kregor
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.