Literature DB >> 12206574

Development and validation of a short measure of health status for individuals with acute myocardial infarction: the myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale (MIDAS).

D R Thompson1, C Jenkinson, A Roebuck, R J P Lewin, R M Boyle, T Chandola.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a disease-specific health status measure for individuals with myocardial infarction (MI). The development of the myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale (MIDAS) followed three main stages. Stage 1 consisted of in-depth, semi-structured, exploratory interviews conducted on a sample of 31 patients to identify areas of salience and concern to patients with MI. These interviews generated 48 candidate questions. In stage 2 the 48-item questionnaire was used in a postal survey to identify appropriate rephrasing/shortening, to determine acceptability and to help identify sub-scales of the instrument addressing different dimensions of MI. Finally, in stage 3 the construct validity of MIDAS subscales was examined in relation to clinical and other health outcomes. A single centre (district general hospital) in England was used for stages 1 and 3 and a national postal survey was conducted for stage 2. A total of 410 patients were recruited for the national survey (stage 2). Full data were available on 348 (85%) patients. One hundred and fifty-five patients were recruited to test construct validity (stage 3). The MIDAS contains 35 questions measuring seven areas of health status: physical activity, insecurity, emotional reaction, dependency, diet, concerns over medication and side effects. The measure has high face, internal and construct validity and is likely to prove useful in the evaluation of treatment regimes for MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12206574     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016354516168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  16 in total

1.  The measurement of health related quality of life.

Authors:  T Treasure
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  L Valenti; L Lim; R F Heller; J Knapp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Patients with depression are less likely to follow recommendations to reduce cardiac risk during recovery from a myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R C Ziegelstein; J A Fauerbach; S S Stevens; J Romanelli; D P Richter; D E Bush
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-06-26

6.  Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  M Dempster; M Donnelly
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Oldridge; G Guyatt; N Jones; J Crowe; J Singer; D Feeny; R McKelvie; J Runions; D Streiner; G Torrance
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  L L Lim; L A Valenti; J C Knapp; A J Dobson; R Plotnikoff; N Higginbotham; R F Heller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Quality of life after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T K Hillers; G H Guyatt; N Oldridge; J Crowe; A Willan; L Griffith; D Feeny
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J A Spertus; J A Winder; T A Dewhurst; R A Deyo; J Prodzinski; M McDonell; S D Fihn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  11 in total

1.  A Chinese Mandarin translation and validation of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS).

Authors:  W Wang; V Lopez; D R Thompson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Association Between Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Health Status Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Faraz Kureshi; Kevin F Kennedy; Philip G Jones; Randal J Thomas; Suzanne V Arnold; Praneet Sharma; Timothy Fendler; Donna M Buchanan; Mohammed Qintar; P Michael Ho; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Neil B Oldridge; John A Spertus
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Health-related quality of life among adults with multiple chronic conditions in the United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007.

Authors:  Han-Yang Chen; Dennis J Baumgardner; Jessica P Rice
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  The Chinese version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS): Mokken scaling.

Authors:  Roger Watson; Wenru Wang; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the CONCARDPCI).

Authors:  Tone M Norekvål; Heather G Allore; Bjørn Bendz; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Britt Borregaard; Gunhild Brørs; Christi Deaton; Nina Fålun; Heather Hadjistavropoulos; Tina Birgitte Hansen; Stig Igland; Alf Inge Larsen; Pernille Palm; Trond Røed Pettersen; Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen; Jan Schjøtt; Rikke Søgaard; Irene Valaker; Ann Dorthe Zwisler; Svein Rotevatn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Continuity of care and its associations with self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Irene Valaker; Bengt Fridlund; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Jan Erik Nordrehaug; Svein Rotevatn; Maj-Britt Råholm; Tone M Norekvål
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life instrument: a summary.

Authors:  Stefan Höfer; Lynette Lim; Gordon Guyatt; Neil Oldridge
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 8.  Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: assessment tools.

Authors:  David R Thompson; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Development and validation of the coronary heart disease scale under the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases QLICD-CHD: combinations of classical test theory and Generalizability Theory.

Authors:  Chonghua Wan; Hezhan Li; Xuejin Fan; Ruixue Yang; Jiahua Pan; Wenru Chen; Rong Zhao
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Protocol for the development and validation of a measure of persistent psychological and emotional distress in cardiac patients: the Cardiac Distress Inventory.

Authors:  Alun Jackson; Michelle Rogerson; Michael Le Grande; David Thompson; Chantal Ski; Marlies Alvarenga; John Amerena; Rosemary Higgins; Michela Raciti; Barbara M Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.