Literature DB >> 12204823

Comparison of home lead dust reduction techniques on hard surfaces: the New Jersey assessment of cleaning techniques trial.

David Q Rich1, George G Rhoads, Lih-Ming Yiin, Junfeng Zhang, Zhipeng Bai, John L Adgate, Peter J Ashley, Paul J Lioy.   

Abstract

High efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA) vacuums, which collect particles > 0.3 micro m, and trisodium phosphate (TSP), a detergent claimed to selectively remove lead, have been included in the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead Based Paint Hazards in Housing without systematic validation of their effectiveness. At the time the study was initiated, both HEPA vacuums and TSP were relatively expensive, they were not readily found in urban retail centers, and there were environmental concerns about the use and disposal of high-phosphate detergents. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in urban high-risk homes in northern New Jersey to determine whether a more readily available and less expensive low-phosphate, non-TSP detergent and non-HEPA vacuum could perform as well as TSP and a HEPA vacuum in a cleaning protocol. Homes were randomized to one of three cleaning methods: TSP/HEPA vacuum, TSP/non-HEPA vacuum, or non-TSP/non-HEPA vacuum. Change in log-transformed lead loading was used in mixed models to compare the efficacy of the three cleaning techniques separately for uncarpeted floors, window sills, and window troughs. After we adjusted for baseline lead loading, the non-HEPA vacuum produced larger reductions on hard floors [19%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3-38%], but the HEPA vacuum produced larger reductions on window sills (22%; 95% CI, 11-32%) and larger reductions on window troughs (16%; 95% CI, -4 to 33%). The non-TSP produced larger reductions on window troughs (21%; 95% CI, -2 to 50%), but TSP produced larger reductions on hard floors (5%; 95% CI, -12 to 19%) and window sills (8%; 95% CI, -5 to 20%). TSP/HEPA produced larger reductions on window sills (28%; 95% CI, 18-37%) and larger reductions on window troughs (2%; 95% CI, -24 to 23%), whereas the non-TSP/non-HEPA method produced larger reductions on hard floors (13%; 95% CI, -5 to 34%). Because neither vacuum nor detergent produced consistent results across surface types, the use of low-phosphate detergents and non-HEPA vacuums in a temporary control measure is supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12204823      PMCID: PMC1240988          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  10 in total

1.  A field comparison of two methods for sampling lead in household dust.

Authors:  D Q Rich; L M Yiin; G G Rhoads; D H Glueck; C Weisel; P J Lioy
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

2.  Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint.

Authors:  M R Farfel; J J Chisolm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures.

Authors:  P J Lioy; L M Yiin; J Adgate; C Weisel; G G Rhoads
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar

4.  A controlled trial of the effect of HEPA vacuuming on childhood lead exposure.

Authors:  S R Hilts; C Hertzman; S A Marion
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

5.  The longer-term effectiveness of residential lead paint abatement.

Authors:  M R Farfel; J J Chisolm; C A Rohde
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  The effect of dust lead control on blood lead in toddlers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G G Rhoads; A S Ettinger; C P Weisel; T J Buckley; K D Goldman; J Adgate; P J Lioy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  A randomized trial of the effect of dust control on children's blood lead levels.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; N L Winter; L Apetz; S Eberly; M Weitzman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Childhood lead poisoning. A controlled trial of the effect of dust-control measures on blood lead levels.

Authors:  E Charney; B Kessler; M Farfel; D Jackson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The contribution of lead-contaminated house dust and residential soil to children's blood lead levels. A pooled analysis of 12 epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; T D Matte; J Rogers; R P Clickner; B Dietz; R L Bornschein; P Succop; K R Mahaffey; S Dixon; W Galke; M Rabinowitz; M Farfel; C Rohde; J Schwartz; P Ashley; D E Jacobs
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Lead analysis of house dust: a method for the detection of another source of lead exposure in inner city children.

Authors:  J J Vostal; F Taves; J W Sayre; E Charney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of techniques to reduce residential lead dust on carpet and upholstery: the new jersey assessment of cleaning techniques trial.

Authors:  Lih-Ming Yiin; George G Rhoads; David Q Rich; Junfeng Zhang; Zhipeng Bai; John L Adgate; Peter J Ashley; Paul J Lioy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Realist review of policy intervention studies aimed at reducing exposures to environmental hazards in the United States.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Nicole Wolfe; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Remediating Thirdhand Smoke Pollution in Multiunit Housing: Temporary Reductions and the Challenges of Persistent Reservoirs.

Authors:  Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Eunha Hoh; Joy M Zakarian; Nathan G Dodder; Rachael A Record; Melbourne F Hovell; E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Samuel Padilla; Laura Markman; Kayo Watanabe; Thomas E Novotny
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Risk remaining from fine particle contaminants after vacuum cleaning of hard floor surfaces.

Authors:  Andrew Hunt; David L Johnson; J Brooks; Daniel A Griffith
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.898

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.