Literature DB >> 12204496

Mortality benefit of beta-blockade after successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Albert W Chan1, Martin J Quinn, Deepak L Bhatt, Derek P Chew, David J Moliterno, Eric J Topol, Stephen G Ellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the mortality benefit of beta-blockers after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers reduce mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), though limited data are available regarding their role after successful PCI.
METHODS: Each year from 1993 through 1999, the first 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were systematically followed up. Patients presenting with acute or recent MI, shock, or unsuccessful revascularization procedures were excluded from the analysis. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data of beta-blocker-treated and non-beta-blocker-treated patients were compared. A multivariate survival analysis model using propensity analysis was used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups.
RESULTS: Of the 4,553 patients, 2,056 (45%) were treated with beta-blockers at the time of the procedure. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a mortality reduction from 1.3% to 0.8% at 30 days (p = 0.13) and a reduction from 6.0% to 3.9% at one year (p = 0.0014). This survival benefit of beta-blockers was independent of left ventricular function, diabetic status, history of hypertension, or history of MI. Using propensity analysis, beta-blocker therapy remained an independent predictor for one-year survival after PCI (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.87; p = 0.0054).
CONCLUSIONS: Within this large prospective registry, beta-blocker use was associated with a marked long-term survival benefit among patients undergoing successful elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12204496     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02013-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries.

Authors:  Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Kevin E Kip; Faith Selzer; Robert L Wilensky; James Slater; Suresh R Mulukutla; Oscar C Marroquin; Peter C Block; David O Williams; Sheryl F Kelsey
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Revascularization and cardioprotective drug treatment in myocardial infarction patients: how do they impact on patients' survival when delivered as usual care.

Authors:  Alain Vanasse; Josiane Courteau; Théophile Niyonsenga
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Relationship Between β-Blocker Therapy at Discharge and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Chenze Li; Yang Sun; Xiaoqing Shen; Ting Yu; Qing Li; Guoran Ruan; Lina Zhang; Qiang Huang; Hang Zhuang; Jingqiu Huang; Li Ni; Luyun Wang; Jiangang Jiang; Yan Wang; Dao Wen Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.