Literature DB >> 12202465

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women.

Ann Cranney, George Wells, Andrew Willan, Lauren Griffith, Nicole Zytaruk, Vivian Robinson, Dennis Black, Jonathan Adachi, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell, Gordon Guyatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of alendronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Controlled trials registry from 1980 to 1999, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings. STUDY SELECTION: We included 11 trials that randomized women to alendronate or placebo and measured bone density for at least 1 yr. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in patients given 5 mg or more of alendronate was 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.65]. The RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 10 mg or more of alendronate was 0.51 (95% CI 0.38-0.69), an appreciably greater effect than for the 5 mg dose. We found a similar reduction in RR across nonvertebral fracture types; in particular, RR reductions for fractures traditionally thought to be "osteoporotic," such as hip and forearm, were very similar to RR reductions for "nonosteoporotic" fractures. Individual studies showed similar results, reflected in the P values of the test of heterogeneity (P = 0.99 for vertebral and 0.88 for nonvertebral fractures). Alendronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density, which increased with both dose and time. After 3 yr of treatment with 10 mg of alendronate or more, the pooled estimate of the difference in percentage change between alendronate and placebo was 7.48% (95% CI 6.12-8.85) for the lumbar spine (2-3 yr), 5.60% (95% CI 4.80-6.39) for the hip (3-4 yr), 2.08% (95% CI 1.53-2.63) for the forearm (2-4 yr), and 2.73% (95% CI 2.27-3.20) for the total body (3 yr). Heterogeneity of the treatment effect of alendronate was not consistently explained by any of our a priori hypotheses; in particular, the effect was very similar in prevention and treatment studies. The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to adverse effects for 5 mg or greater of alendronate was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42). The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects for 5 mg or greater was 1.03 (0.81-1.30, P = 0.83), and the pooled RR for GI adverse effects with continuation of medication was 1.03 (0.98 to 1.07) P = 0.23.
CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate increases bone density in both early postmenopausal women and those with established osteoporosis while reducing the rate of vertebral fracture over 2-3 yr of treatment. Reductions in nonvertebral fractures are evident among postmenopausal women without prevalent fractures and have bone mineral density (BMD) levels below the World Health Organization threshold for osteoporosis. The impact on fractures appears consistent across all fracture types, casting doubt on traditional distinctions between osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202465     DOI: 10.1210/er.2001-2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Rev        ISSN: 0163-769X            Impact factor:   19.871


  125 in total

1.  Bisphosphonates and skeletal morbidity in patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Should all elderly women receive bisphosphonates to prevent osteoporotic fractures?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Ocular side effects of bisphosphonates: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Meredith McKague; Derek Jorgenson; Kelly A Buxton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Bisphosphonates in pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M O'Sullivan; A B Grey; R Singh; I R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jean-Jacques Body; Yves Boutsen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Randomized trial comparing low-dose hormone replacement therapy and HRT plus 1alpha-OH-vitamin D3 (alfacalcidol) for treatment of postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  Hideki Mizunuma; Masataka Shiraki; Masafumi Shintani; Itsuo Gorai; Kazuya Makita; Shunichi Itoga; Yoshiko Mochizuki; Hiromichi Mogi; Yasuhisa Iwaoki; Shouichirou Kosha; Toshiyuki Yasui; Osamu Ishihara; Takumi Kurabayashi; Yoshio Kasuga; Kunihiko Hayashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Michel Fortier; Heather Frame; André Lalonde; Alexandra Papaioannou; Vyta Senikas; Chui Kin Yuen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2006-02

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Hormone therapy for the prevention of bone loss in menopausal women with osteopenia: is it a viable option?

Authors:  Mary H Hohenhaus; Kelly A McGarry; Nananda F Col
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.